Chess if kind of like pay to win. Wow I didn’t know Magnus pays for someone to win in his matches. Interesting.
Chess.com is kind of pay to win, change my mind

i mean like, for the gold, platinum and diamond memberships and stuff. If you dont have that, to a certain extent, determines how good you are, based on how much more is available through the memberships
i mean like, for the gold, platinum and diamond memberships and stuff. If you dont have that, to a certain extent, determines how good you are, based on how much more is available through the memberships
Of course it helps. I can’t deny that.
what?
ig not, if you are that person tho message me on lichess, SILVERKNIGHT101
Why did you thought that?

what?
ig not, if you are that person tho message me on lichess, SILVERKNIGHT101
Why did you thought that?
there is a super amazing player on lichess cause chesscomispaytowin, he is a legend

Chess.com isn’t any more pay to win than lichess or any other chess website is, because it’s literally the same game. I could see an argument being made that chess is pay to win, but chess.com surely isn’t.


...