Chess.com sucks
Sort:
rules are clear xD
Chess.com is nice
Apr 30, 2025
0
#123
Yep its true, but I would avoid making unnecessary useless posts that are altogether pointless and a waist of my yours and everyone else,s time. So can we just keep that strait?
Leopard wrote:
Yep its true, but I would avoid making unnecessary useless posts that are altogether pointless and a waist of my yours and everyone else,s time. So can we just keep that strait?
They should add a section for grammar lessons.
Apr 30, 2025
0
#125
BasixWhiteBoy wrote:
Leopard wrote:
Yep its true, but I would avoid making unnecessary useless posts that are altogether pointless and a waist of my yours and everyone else,s time. So can we just keep that strait?
They should add a section for grammar lessons.
cause i wrote every thing wrong like an absolute loser 2 year old?
Apr 30, 2025
0
#126
justbefair wrote:
Stonewall_Defence wrote:
Title says it all
Hmm. You sound mad.
You have played nearly 26,000 games here. What happened?
Did something change? There must have been something of redeeming value to keep you here all those thousands of hours.
Good point 
Too many rapid players at 1000 elo, but playing at 1700 skill. To many 900 blitz players playing at 1500 skill or higher, basically making it impossible for average to decent player to win consistently enough to make it a fair and rewarding experience imo.
How to play chess better?
Apr 30, 2025
0
#129
I agree in the playing part. I keep coming for the puzzles, videos and training. But chess.com has become unplayable. You go to an open tournament and players in the 1000 are harder to play against than those in the 1700. Very frustrating. It is statistically impossible the combinations they find and how very little blunders they commit. But that´s ok. As long as the training materials are good I guess I´ll stick around. But I am seriously considering leaving, even after being a Diamond member for 13-14 years.
Jul 5, 2025
0
#130
Unsubscribe to the membership, it’s just not fun grinding away and then hitting a wall of like 1700 players at 900 elo 17-20 games in a row. Influencers and YouTube can gussy it up but the facts remain, you gain any momentum in the 800-1200 range and you magically hit a wall of people playing 700 elo from your range.
Everyone now uses engines to study best move reactions and attacking lines, any time I try to play in a human way I get destroyed by a series of best moves generally in a way msny humans wouldn't play. Many players have simply copied engines play and you can see the difference, this is especially egregious in lower elo chess were you wouldn't expect best move set responses in seconds, just seems like it should take more then 4 seconds to come up with top engine moves at 900 elo imo...
It sounds like all of you think the site sucks because of cheaters who you lose to.
You're overexaggerating. Play better and stop having an excuse to fall back on for losing.
No matter that this is their chosen site for online chess, they still love to complain, mostly because they think everything should be free. Chess.com should be non-profit and all its employees should be unpaid volunteers.
And there isn't enough cheating to "ruin the game", sorry to spoil your excuse. You just ruin it for yourself by obsessing about it.
I didn't say it was ruined, just the opposite.
I did not. I deleted a response to @Gately-MovebyMove.
I have never said I was concerned about cheating.
And I have never said I was concerned about rating losses.
thedelcai wrote:
And there isn't enough cheating to "ruin the game", sorry to spoil your excuse. You just ruin it for yourself by obsessing about it.
Sololevelingsirjohn wrote:
Everyone now uses engines
I dont
