17436 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I was on tatic trainer the other day and even solved the problem first try, just the same I noticed that after reviewing the puzzle, it worked out that my Queen could have been taken by the King I was chaseing but did not because I had a Bishop in line with my Queen. The same Bishop was protecting my King from being in check due to anouther Bishop was lined up to put my King in check if it moved and that Bishop was backed by it's Queen. The question is, why could the King not take the Queen realizing it's only defence was the Bishop that was pinned? I asked a friend about it and he said it was the rule.If true, where does one find the absolute rules regarding chess?
It is a rule. You can find the rules in the Rules and Basics in learn.
Been there done that, I did not see it
The official rules are available here:
The rule you want is rule 3.9; it states:
The king is said to be 'in check' if it is attacked by one or more of the opponent's pieces, even if such pieces are constrained from moving to that square because they would then leave or place their own king in check. No piece can be moved that will either expose the king of the same colour to check or leave that king in check.
Thank you HappyUngulate for your post, as a chess player I not only want to get better, but I have a strong desire to know all I can know about this game called chess. Clear rules covering every thing will make me better in my moves to come.
I feel... defeated... whaa....
The notion that <1000 is awful?
by madhacker a few minutes ago
Why are so many non members on this site?
by aidan0816 6 minutes ago
Nakamura is Japanese not American
by With_every_step 6 minutes ago
To the people who won't stop complaining about other people
by kaynight 9 minutes ago
10/25/2016 - Too Far Advanced
by Leoneeds 15 minutes ago
Sub 1000 (ranging from just below 1000 to about 400 :O)
by AIM-AceMove 15 minutes ago
Time loss for f2p players punishes many other players
by ponz111 22 minutes ago
Is 1....e6 a good and flexible move against 1.d4?
by EdwinAugustus 25 minutes ago
by DrSpudnik 31 minutes ago
erik and cc staff
by DrSpudnik 36 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
Try the new Chess.com!
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!