A little background on the sacrifice: It is apparently the most humane way to take the life of an animal and two thirds of all the meat actually goes to the poor and hungry. It’s considered something rather benevolent.
A Russian friend of mine said he’d never seen anything like that and asked that I take pictures on the day of the event. Most of my family thought it was odd that I was photographing the situation.
I made a photo album to share little pieces of my life with Chess.com friends…and I thought this photo was a part of that.
Bigpoison. You are absolutely right about that. I have the most hilarious story…growing up in Europe and the US…I was in a third world country and I one day threw a tantrum about needing to go to a grocery store that was an hour away to get apple sauce. A woman asked me if we could pick apples from the orchard to make this “apple sauce”…and I looked at her incredulously and said “nooo, it is made in factories…they do stuff to it”. I looked on the internet an hour later and was horrified to see recipes for homemade apple sauce containing little more than cinnamon, boiled apples…and the homemade version was like a million times better. That was embarrassing. And true.

,sarky (i can do italics too) is an english common slang for mordant (another 
I didn't allow it.
My kids set up the profiles without my knowledge or consent and Facebook will not give me admin rights to my kid's profiles.
But see it's more complicated that that - the kids live with my evil ex, who herself is a felon.
I find your assumption that I would allow such action to be quite offensive, but you were perhaps ignorant of how California law works and/or ignorant of Facebook's policies so I forgive you. Just don't do it again.
Excuse me? You don't have custody of the children, and you still wish to claim admin access to their accounts? From a legal perspective, you have no right. Legally, if they are living with your ex, she is the guardian.
But that is quite besides the point. Perhaps you are ignorant of how the law works in regard to websites. Amazingly, Californian law could only be seen to apply to Facebook if the servers were located in California. Even if this were not the case, nothing illegal is being done by any parties - except perhaps your own attempt to gain unauthorised access to another person's account on a website.
Children being legally defined as children means nothing, as there is no law against children talking to people on a social networking site that I'm aware of. Even if there was, it wouldn't be the website that could be punished unless it was physically located in an area to which the law applied.