The only action required is your own self control.
You have not divined my purpose from my statements, and control is never lost.
The only action required is your own self control.
You have not divined my purpose from my statements, and control is never lost.
The only action required is your own self control.
You have not divined my purpose from my statements, and control is never lost.
I have interpreted your comments as florid excuses for lack of self control. You are engaged in the archetypal forum feud which can be viewed on any forum, and the belligerents will rarely admit it's their ego compelling them to engage continually over long periods.
The only action required is your own self control.
You have not divined my purpose from my statements, and control is never lost.
I have interpreted your comments as florid excuses for lack of self control. You are engaged in the archetypal forum feud which can be viewed on any forum, and the belligerents will rarely admit it's their ego compelling them to engage continually over long periods.
You are free to interpret things as you like. Expressing your interpretation in this manner requires a certain level of hypocrisy, however.
And another thread that has become, just plain boring and irrelevant. Not sure why I still had the “Follow” box checked. Now, on with life.
The only action required is your own self control.
You have not divined my purpose from my statements, and control is never lost.
Control is never lost... but I'm compelled to comment whenever I disagree with optimissed... in fact I have a moral obligation! To not reply 100 times if day, if that's what it takes, would be obscene!
You're in complete control? Uh, sure...
Funny, it's so funny, I find it funny - Unsure what to make of such consistent preamble. Some folks like to start sentences with basically or frankly or honestly. As if the sentence would have no standing on its own otherwise.
From Kool and the gang entertainment to home improvement information. I like where Mudd and nerves are taking us!
This line of reasoning has been creeping into my conscious lately:
"Hitchens's Challenge: to name at least one moral action that an atheist could not possibly perform, and conversely, to name one immoral action that only a person with a faith could perform or has performed in the past."
And so now we look at this
Hahaha and when he disagrees with me, it would be an exaggeration to suggest that he's correct once in a hundred times
And it has me thinking
"Make a statement that a mature adult could not possibly make / / make a statement that only a child could make"
Both of you sound like bickering children... which is fine, the forum is full of them... but I get annoyed when you guys act like you're anything but.
That's irish.
I have some Scotch nearby. Hang on.
Rare to find a triple distilled scotch!
Control is never lost... but I'm compelled to comment whenever I disagree with optimissed... in fact I have a moral obligation! To not reply 100 times if day, if that's what it takes, would be obscene!
You're in complete control? Uh, sure...
Go ahead and let me know when you find a post where I am out of control, I guess.
Ah hypocrisy. Maybe I should point out all your personal attacks on others? Hypocrisy could become quite a thing now, couldn't it.
Feel free. Point out an "attack".
The AC needs repairing. People on this thread are raging due to the suffering of heat waves.
Either you are a fan or you are a cool out AC.
I know a lot of people don't like their slumbers being disturbed. Honestly, I like you but stop acting like a grumpy old goat.
Now Coolout has gone, is it ok to say that I was convinced he was bt's alt? I'm still pretty sure of it but of course I can't prove it. But all I have to say is "your argument's like Coolout's", which is true because many of their approaches were identical, and he starts acting as if they really were the same person. He really doesn't have to keep telling me that I'm saying they're the same person. I'm actually not saying that, in fact. It's just his method to try to kill all argument and kill criticism. His arguments about luck are absolutely identical to Mr C's. Now am I supposed to refrain from saying that? Just because he's scared of something?
So stop tarring me with the same brush ok? And as far as Hitchens' comment went, there is NO moral action that an atheist couldn't perfom, because morality and doing the right thing have nothing to do with one's beliefs and if he thought they have then he was wrong.
Your paranoia is showing. The guy who eats brown stuff would definitely be a more likely candidate.
Has anyone rented a brass band?
Will there be fireworks?