The internet is not the Pony Express, but electronic communications are correspondence whether through direct person-to-person messages or via a website. Hence correspondence chess can be played online just as it has been played via telegraph, post card, and email.
Yeah, and that's why I said that all games on the internet could have correspondence thrown in front of them. Which is what makes it pointless.
why does that make it pointless?
???? What would be the point of throwing the same word before all turn based internet game types and using that as part of the name of the game. It's just redundant.
You play backgammon on the internet, you say you're playing backgammon. Why would you want it to be called correspondence backgammon?
For example in real correspondence chess, can you make a premove? it's not like this is the limit to how it will change forever. A new term for a new way is more appropriate. As time controls and not letters or distance still remain the true difference, I don't see why sticking with an outdated term should be used.
I assume by "real" correspondence chess you mean postal chess (on line correspondence chess is real). In postal correspondence chess you could make a premove, I used to do it all the time is called conditional moves and took the form of "if, then" on the post card. The term correspondence chess is not outdated (although it does have a long tradition). The reason you use it is because people instantly know what the rules are. Yes, you could cheat in live chess and no one might not now the difference, but it still would be cheating. I believe that cheating is not an outdated term either. While you are busy making up new terms, why not be consistant and make up a new term for chess (the word chess is even older than the word correspondence) as for me I will stick to words that people know the meaning of.