erik, we are frustrated

Sort:
llama
autobunny wrote:
llama wrote:

And look, I understand, if you're 9 years old a real conversation is confusing. I understand when kids post "???"

But just because I understand it doesn't make it appropriate. Mute the little sh!ts, no one will care, and neither will they, since they didn't have anything to say in the first place.

OMG a bully, so toxic. Help. My fidget spinner feels threatened.  Mods!!!!! 

Sorry. Too much stress. Heard an ant got crushed somewhere in the Amazon forest. Couldn't handle the grief. 

Being overly sensitive is at least human, but they're even lower than that.

Most of the things the little kids say communicate literally nothing... which is common and normal. Kids say things all the time to test social norms and learn from the feedback for example.

autobunny
52yrral wrote:

Spanking is out for kids...

No you.  OK boomer.  Whatever.  What?  Hmm. 😆😅😜😬😉😕😡😠😤😴

x-9140319185
llama wrote:
autobunny wrote:
llama wrote:

And look, I understand, if you're 9 years old a real conversation is confusing. I understand when kids post "???"

But just because I understand it doesn't make it appropriate. Mute the little sh!ts, no one will care, and neither will they, since they didn't have anything to say in the first place.

OMG a bully, so toxic. Help. My fidget spinner feels threatened.  Mods!!!!! 

Sorry. Too much stress. Heard an ant got crushed somewhere in the Amazon forest. Couldn't handle the grief. 

Being overly sensitive is at least human, but they're even lower than that.

Most of the things the little kids say communicate literally nothing... which is common and normal. Kids say things all the time to test social norms and learn from the feedback for example.

That's called data collecting for the neural networks that run on wetware rather than hardware.

autobunny

Sorry Al. Wasn't trying to derail your topic. Just trying to express the same in a language understood by the current chess.com majority.

When even @erik says tldr what is a bunny to do? 

Will remove on request. 

llama
GMproposedsolutions wrote:

Some sites are useful for adding to frustration and others for relieving it. It's nature working together.

Let's say I have a deck of cards... but they aren't normal playing cards. There are only 40 of them, and on each card is a number. It starts at 1 and goes in order of the natural numbers up to 40.

Now I shuffle the deck an arbitrary number of times so that the cards are random, and draw 8 cards.

What is the probability that the 8th card I draw will complete "the set."

"The set" is defined as the 5 cards numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.

For example lets say after the 7th card I have the following:  22, 1, 4, 5, 17, 3, 39

And then for the 8th card I draw the number 2.

That would complete "the set" because I now hold 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

---

I ask because

1) I disagreed with someone about this and I think I'm right

2) IIRC you're handy with math

x-9140319185

@autobunny, I'll explain in layman's terms. Wetware is a biological mechanism that do certain actions, such as add one plus one. Hardware is what your computer uses, and can perform the same action using a Central Processing Unit. A neural network is a system that analyzes certain actions to achieve a certain goal, for example, how to drive. It stumbles around until it finds a way, and that's how it works. Our brains are made up of several such networks working in unison. Got it?

autobunny
TerminatorC800 wrote:

@autobunny, I'll explain in layman's terms. Wetware is a biological mechanism that do certain actions, such as add one plus one. Hardware is what your computer uses, and can perform the same action using a Central Processing Unit. A neural network is a system that analyzes certain actions to achieve a certain goal, for example, how to drive. It stumbles around until it finds a way, and that's how it works. Our brains are made up of several such networks working in unison. Got it?

Did the bunny ask for an explanation? But thanks for attempting to educate the bunny 😁

x-9140319185

Did the bunny learn something? (Our brain is made out of wetware, too).

llama
GMproposedsolutions wrote:

There are different approaches, one is to consider the complement. Now what is not clear is the 8th card being the only card completing a set and the ONLY card completing whereas before the 8th card there as no set, meaning 4,5,6,7,8,15,1 for example have been picked and then the 8th card is a "3". This is crucial. Logic must never be suppressed.

I probably phrased it poorly.

Let's say 35 cards are blank, and 5 cards have a star (the deck totals 40 cards). A person draws from a shuffled deck until they have all 5 star cards. After they have all 5 they stop and the game is over.

What is the probability that the game ends after the 8th card is drawn?

autobunny
TerminatorC800 wrote:

Did the bunny learn something? (Our brain is made out of wetware, too).

The bunny is too dumb to understand anything technical. Or non technical. 

batgirl
llama wrote:
 

The concept of being valuable to the community is itself absurd. 

Then the idea of deeming what is nonsense is equally absurd. 

duntcare

Uhm hello, the point of forums is to get help not just from staff but members too, boi, chill out, your a non paying member, so like, this is a huge cost, boi, chill, dude, ur a new member, SO DONT EVEN THINK ABOUT IT, INFACT ME AS A REGULAR MEMBER KNOWS A LOT ABOUT THIS SITE, a long with other members, hehe, chess.com beta and other stuff, sorry for the bad grammar but I'm becoming more and more lazy 

llama
batgirl wrote:
llama wrote:
 

The concept of being valuable to the community is itself absurd. 

Then the idea of deeming what is nonsense is equally absurd. 

This is funny, coming from a mod.

You literally volunteer your time to help impose order. The concept of order necessarily values one kind of thing over another. If you believe in the post modern infinite interpretations blah blah blah, then the act of muting, for example is an abuse of power.

duntcare

look, u cant create a perfect ai bot,  just email support, I did and they responded faster than I rechecked my email, he said he checked and saw I was frustrated not being a jerk when I got bot muted and un muted me, there are thousands of members and a few of support, SO CHILL OUT AND STOP BEING SOME SCREAMY RARE SAPPHIRE KNIGHT AGED KID again very terrible grammar 

autobunny
duntcare wrote:

Uhm hello, the point of forums is to get help not just from staff but members too, boi, chill out, your a non paying member, so like, this is a huge cost, boi, chill, dude, ur a new member, SO DONT EVEN THINK ABOUT IT, INFACT ME AS A REGULAR MEMBER KNOWS A LOT ABOUT THIS SITE, a long with other members, hehe, chess.com beta and other stuff, sorry for the bad grammar but I'm becoming more and more lazy 

This post needs to be preserved as representative of today's average forum post quality. Except that it has too many words and sentences... 

batgirl
llama wrote:

The concept of order necessarily values one kind of thing over another.

But you're the one who said attaching value to comments is absurd.

duntcare

Really dont mind my grammar, quarentine mak me lazy 

duntcare

i cant type good now 

llama

By the way, my answer is this.

The way my brain works is I want to first determine the state of holding 7 cards, 4 of which are stars. So I do the permutation 7p4 which is 840. This is my numerator, i.e. the winning states.

We divide this by the total number of states of 7 cards -- which for a deck of 40 is:

40*39*38*37*36*35*34

Then the chance of the 8th card being a star is 1 in 33.

So it's 840 / (40*39*38*37*36*35*34*33)

x-9140319185

@autobunny, just look at @littlejimmywimmy here: https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-com-community/why-is-the-the-chess-com-community-so-toxic-52489904?page=61

That's not quality posting.

This forum topic has been locked