Fraud

Sort:
Avatar of GM-Hongwaree

chess.com lied to us. They made a post where we voted for best this, best that, and that there will be 10 premium memberships for us voters... I haven't seen a single post where the winners are mentioned. And you say you care about us, chess community?

Avatar of Martin_Stahl
GM-Hongwaree wrote:

chess.com lied to us. They made a post where we voted for best this, best that, and that there will be 10 premium memberships for us voters... I haven't seen a single post where the winners are mentioned. And you say you care about us, chess community?

The winners were chosen and contacted. The site doesn't publish a list

Avatar of GM-Hongwaree
Martin_Stahl wrote:
GM-Hongwaree wrote:

chess.com lied to us. They made a post where we voted for best this, best that, and that there will be 10 premium memberships for us voters... I haven't seen a single post where the winners are mentioned. And you say you care about us, chess community?

The winners were chosen and contacted. The site doesn't publish a list

So, how do we know the giveaway was real? huh? As usual, transparency ain't chess.com specialty, right?

Avatar of Wits-end

I guess it’s safe to say that I know at last two players that didn’t win.

Avatar of Martin_Stahl
GM-Hongwaree wrote:

So, how do we know the giveaway was real? huh? As usual, transparency ain't chess.com specialty, right?

There's zero reason for staff not to award the members.

Avatar of Martin_Stahl
Martin_Stahl wrote:
GM-Hongwaree wrote:

So, how do we know the giveaway was real? huh? As usual, transparency ain't chess.com specialty, right?

There's zero reason for staff not to award the members.

https://www.chess.com/news/view/2024-chesscom-awards-winners

Avatar of GM-Hongwaree
Martin_Stahl wrote:
GM-Hongwaree wrote:

So, how do we know the giveaway was real? huh? As usual, transparency ain't chess.com specialty, right?

There's zero reason for staff not to award the members.

There's zero reason for me to believe your greedy ones are willing to do that, hence I need proof.

Avatar of BigChessplayer665
GM-Hongwaree wrote:
Martin_Stahl wrote:
GM-Hongwaree wrote:

So, how do we know the giveaway was real? huh? As usual, transparency ain't chess.com specialty, right?

There's zero reason for staff not to award the members.

There's zero reason for me to believe your greedy ones are willing to do that, hence I need proof.

what if the players want to remain unanimous i bet alot do. announcing the winners to the entire community could get them harassment from trolls like viroh if they are unlucky

Avatar of GM-Hongwaree
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
GM-Hongwaree wrote:
Martin_Stahl wrote:
GM-Hongwaree wrote:

So, how do we know the giveaway was real? huh? As usual, transparency ain't chess.com specialty, right?

There's zero reason for staff not to award the members.

There's zero reason for me to believe your greedy ones are willing to do that, hence I need proof.

what if the players want to remain unanimous i bet alot do. announcing the winners to the entire community could get them harassment from trolls like viroh if they are unlucky

It seems unlikely someone would get harrased for winning.

Avatar of Martin_Stahl
GM-Hongwaree wrote:
Martin_Stahl wrote:
GM-Hongwaree wrote:

So, how do we know the giveaway was real? huh? As usual, transparency ain't chess.com specialty, right?

There's zero reason for staff not to award the members.

There's zero reason for me to believe your greedy ones are willing to do that, hence I need proof.

You don't have to believe it but that also doesn't make it untrue. Unless someone that was chosen posts about it, then the only proof there will be is the notification in the article. surprise