Has anyone ever beat the "Maximum" 3200 bot?

nice joke

https://www.youtube.com/@alandai-m4x

I beat it more than ten times, whether through gambits or regular openings. I've even managed to beat the Maximum level engine (3200) in less than 25 moves.

This is not sarcasm or anything. You can always beat the bot if the engine blunders against your gambit or aggressive attack.

Proof???

he has done it but it means nothing cause the bot plays very fast and the user can take all the time in the world..its not realistic chess user vs bot game..no one can beat the latest stockfish and engines as strong with the same time.

I KNOW!!! I CAN DO IT TO!!!! AND HAVE!!!!! I PROMISE!!!!

Hi

I'm sorry man but that is just untrue.

From my experience, Engine/Komodo ratings are heavily inflated, so a GM could probably beat it on a good day.

very good day

Were you playing bullet?

If I had quuen, 2 rook, and 3 pawn odds, maybe I could do it.

Honestly, I’ve wondered the same thing—has anyone actually beaten the 3200 bot legit, without some form of assist? The thing plays like a monster. You can prep all you want, but once you're in the endgame, it feels like you're being slowly strangled by perfect logic.

That's a legit question, and one I’ve been mulling over too. I’ve been playing mid-stakes online for the past few years, and honestly, it’s becoming harder to tell the difference between a sharp reg and a well-tuned AI script. What’s crazy is that even the pros now rely on solvers for post-game review. They’re still human, sure, but they're practically blending with machine playstyles.

What’s wild is how sites are now full of hybrid players who study using bots but don’t realize how much it changes their intuition at the table—or in this case, on the board. There’s a great article that breaks this down, looking at how AI has actually shifted how humans approach risk and deception. It's not just that bots are better at bluff-catching—it's that they’ve taught players to do it more methodically. You might wanna check it out here: https://aipokerbot.com/blog/

Lol, nice

https://www.chess.com/games/archive?gameOwner=my_game&gameTypes%5B0%5D=chess960&gameTypes%5B1%5D=daily&gameType=computer&page=1

I think it is possible for a human to do it. You can change the time to 1 minute bullet and just try to survive. This trick mostly works but of course it doesn't count. Magnus played it and he resigned after being down too much material. It doesn't do the perfect move in every scenario; it can do excellent moves, good moves (*very rare), inaccuracies (*more common than you'd think), and brilliant moves* that can make their position worse. Stockfish can easily beat it, so that's something. I tested Magnus bot vs. maximum bot; Magnus was down 1 pawn for the entire game and lost to a promoting queen. It is definitely humanly possible and I'd say some people above 2700 ELO (GM) would be able to do it if they studied the best moves using a lot of time.

*Yes, a lot of the time, brilliant moves are worse than "best" moves, positionally.

One of my friends beat it, yeah. He said premoving in blitz setting works 30% of the time.

well it is possible because I just beat it some how no ai assistance I'm so confused maybe the computer messed up but I'm 1626 as my highest rating and here's proof I beat it.

also here is the game.

i have win it whitout anything

Yeah…….no