Has anyone ever beat the "Maximum" 3200 bot?

Sort:
Bonbon_TV

Hi

eneria12

Great question! I totally get why data security is such a major concern. In cloud call centers, they typically use encryption to protect data both at rest and in transit. Also, multi-factor authentication (MFA) is commonly implemented to ensure only authorized users have access. On top of that, regular security audits are carried out to ensure the system is up to date and vulnerabilities are minimized. One thing I found really interesting is how cloud call centers have evolved to integrate advanced cybersecurity protocols, ensuring compliance with industry regulations. There’s a great article that goes into detail about how these systems are shaping modern business communication, including aspects like security measures. You can check it out here: https://tripleareview.com/how-cloud-call-center-software-shape-modern-business-communication/ . It gives a broader perspective on the technological advancements, especially regarding security.

AncientSilverDragon
Hripfria202 wrote:

It's impossible without cheating (which is allowed on chess.com against bots, but it won't count as YOU beat maximum). I don't really believe the 1300 rated players that say that they beat it as even I couldn't do it even one time even with 1 minute. If you play with 1 minute, the computer eventually starts to move faster, and you will eventually blunder many material, and computer will easily checkmate you.

I'm sorry man but that is just untrue.

LordOTheFries

From my experience, Engine/Komodo ratings are heavily inflated, so a GM could probably beat it on a good day.

AGC-Gambit_YT
buzz960 wrote:

From my experience, Engine/Komodo ratings are heavily inflated, so a GM could probably beat it on a good day.

very good day

FlamingDragon2th
Woollensock2 wrote:
I managed to beat it a few days ago, by playing the little known “ Woolly Gambit “ ......at a crucial moment in the game , it seemed to dither as if it didn’t know exactly what to do, which cost it the game ! Happy.png ✌️😎

Were you playing bullet?

Mid-KnightRider
everydaymachines wrote:

Is it even possible?

If I had quuen, 2 rook, and 3 pawn odds, maybe I could do it.

eneria12

Honestly, I’ve tried playing the 3200 bot just for fun, and it’s like hitting a brick wall every time. Even when I play really carefully, it just finds some ridiculous tactic or positional grind that eventually wears me down. I don’t know if anyone’s legit beaten it without some sort of setup or engine help—it just feels inhuman (which makes sense, because it is).

Funny enough, the last time I played it, my Samsung TV suddenly turned off mid-game and I couldn't find the power button to get it back on. Turns out, Samsung TVs can be tricky because the power button isn’t always in the obvious spot like on older models. I found it eventually hidden under the bezel, but it felt like searching for a secret chess tactic 😅.

Anyway, I ended up finding this guide that explained everything clearly, even how to turn it on without a remote using your phone or HDMI-CEC: turn on Samsung TV without remote. Saved me a lot of frustration—maybe helpful if your tech ever decides to rage-quit a game too

FlamingDragon2th

Lol, nice

Waleedano

https://www.chess.com/games/archive?gameOwner=my_game&gameTypes%5B0%5D=chess960&gameTypes%5B1%5D=daily&gameType=computer&page=1

VanGuard_Ultrachad

While it's widely believed the Chess.com's "Maximum" 3200 bot is essentially unbeatable, there are reports of players claiming to have defeated it. Some of these wins have been attributed to unconventional strategies, such as playing against the bot with both White and Black, copying moves, or exploiting potential vulnerabilities in the bot's logic. However, many of these claims have been met with skepticism, with some users suggesting they may be exaggerating or using external analysis tools.

FitzgeraldX

I think it is possible for a human to do it. You can change the time to 1 minute bullet and just try to survive. This trick mostly works but of course it doesn't count. Magnus played it and he resigned after being down too much material. It doesn't do the perfect move in every scenario; it can do excellent moves, good moves (*very rare), inaccuracies (*more common than you'd think), and brilliant moves* that can make their position worse. Stockfish can easily beat it, so that's something. I tested Magnus bot vs. maximum bot; Magnus was down 1 pawn for the entire game and lost to a promoting queen. It is definitely humanly possible and I'd say some people above 2700 ELO (GM) would be able to do it if they studied the best moves using a lot of time.

*Yes, a lot of the time, brilliant moves are worse than "best" moves, positionally.

Ethanchock7

One of my friends beat it, yeah. He said premoving in blitz setting works 30% of the time.

DrakonicStriker_017
Yea
VanGuard_Ultrachad

yes is possible i did beat it

ohcustomjr2

well it is possible because I just beat it some how no ai assistance I'm so confused maybe the computer messed up but I'm 1626 as my highest rating and here's proof I beat it.

also here is the game.

VanGuard_Ultrachad

okay sir

Trn-Minh-Quang

chesspawn0-0bqwq i have win it whitout anything

ChessTiger297
Trn-Minh-Quang wrote:

i have win it whitout anything

Yeah…….no

Nayonikastronomathematics
Trn-Minh-Quang wrote:

i have win it whitout anything

Thats impossible. Not even the top GM'S can...