Just don’t play
then how can you establish yourself as a coward?
You can, (Not possible in OTB but can be in online chess ) challenge some player for a game, when they come to live chess for your challenge....abort the game and don’t play...
excellent. honestly hadn't thought of that.
Perpetual check is part of the game and not being a coward
really, there is no part of the game that could be considered cowardice?
7) Refuse all gambits
8) If you smh accepted a gambit you give the pawn back
9) You play all boring openings
10) You think exciting chess is "luck"
We are an inclusive platform and welcome everybody. However some of us do want to focus on becoming cowards. Think of it as a playing style.
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/off-topic/what-is-my-style
7) Refuse all gambits
8) If you smh accepted a gambit you give the pawn back
9) You play all boring openings
10) You think exciting chess is "luck"
Nice focus on openings
What about playing the hippo?
That seems cowardly.
More like scary
Different folks have different dreams. This, is the bunny's.
So put in 10000 hours into the following to become an expert
1. refuse rematch
2. flag your opponent
3. use perpetual check to force a draw when you're losing by material
4. force a stalemate or allowing a stalemate when you're losing by material
5. resign when your opponent is about to crush you
There's one other way to be a coward:
Act like @Colby-Covington
Different folks have different dreams. This, is the bunny's.
So put in 10000 hours into the following to become an expert
1. refuse rematch
2. flag your opponent
3. use perpetual check to force a draw when you're losing by material
4. force a stalemate or allowing a stalemate when you're losing by material
5. resign when your opponent is about to crush you
that isnt cowardice, thats just the smart thing to do, except #5 and #2
Different folks have different dreams. This, is the bunny's.
So put in 10000 hours into the following to become an expert
1. refuse rematch
2. flag your opponent
3. use perpetual check to force a draw when you're losing by material
4. force a stalemate or allowing a stalemate when you're losing by material
5. resign when your opponent is about to crush you
I don't see anyyhing bad in 1, 3 , 4, not sure about 5 and don't know what 2 means.
i try to NOT lose, i dont try to perposly lose but be a hero
alive cowards are better than dead heroes
Different folks have different dreams. This, is the bunny's.
So put in 10000 hours into the following to become an expert
1. refuse rematch
2. flag your opponent
3. use perpetual check to force a draw when you're losing by material
4. force a stalemate or allowing a stalemate when you're losing by material
5. resign when your opponent is about to crush you
There's one other way to be a coward:
Act like @Colby-Covington
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Different folks have different dreams. This, is the bunny's.
So put in 10000 hours into the following to become an expert
1. refuse rematch
2. flag your opponent
3. use perpetual check to force a draw when you're losing by material
4. force a stalemate or allowing a stalemate when you're losing by material
5. resign when your opponent is about to crush you
There's one other way to be a coward:
Act like @Colby-Covington
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
ur pfp is trash man
no u
Perpetual check or forcing stalemate in a lost position is not at all cowardice, it's just a part of the game.
If you are winning, it is up to you to avoid to trash the win into the bin by falling into traps like them.
Or maybe even capturing a piece of yourd and not letting you win is cowardice?
Regarding the fifth point, I live under the assumption that refraining from resigning in "hopeless" positions is actually the cowardly thing to do.
no that is where they accuse you of having no respect for your opponent who failed to convert the win