How you deal with trash player?

or just had to do something irl, and then played the game. I didn't look at the game you guys are talking about, but based off of that information, there is nothing wrong.

#inb4thelock

Yep, same pattern in other games.

ok but 2500 rating is kinda out of my or your league

There's more to it than that but ok, I wont argue it forever here. You're right that it's not supposed to be in the forums... and sure I can't know 100%, so it's better to leave it up to chess.com, blah blah blah.

Honestly if he weren't bragging and calling his opponent "trash" I probably wouldn't have said anything, and just quietly reported him...

Ok, but I never said we should report our opponents.

I also said a few times during that discussion that I haven't reported any of my opponents.

yeah.. sure I am not angry at you because I would think that you are some vengeful person who report everybody who doesn't like... I understand that its some kind of academic theorethical discussion and blah blah.. 
I just don't think that is good showing in public forums this kind of "let's ban everybody for cheating attitude"

Looking at the replay with @Rubenpekasau it's far from obvious that the O.P. cheated. White played the opening in an unorthodox but logical fashion but then proceeded to make several bad mistakes. White wasn't worth the 83% accuracy, or whatever white was awarded. It was fairly easy for black, given white's mistakes and I think it was just an anomaly of the engine awarding 99.3% because black wasn't worth that. Black played well but I would have thought that the early e5 was inaccurate. But maybe it's a move an engine might make, even so. Black should be attacking in the centre, not playing e5, because white's opening is too slow.

A trick I like to use for early center pawn moves like 5.e5 is it should do at least one of the following:

1) It opens a central square for my knight
2) It chases away an enemy knight in a way that it can't go to a central square

In this case 5.e5 can be met by 5...d5, and so my knight can't go to e4, so it's better to not play it... of course sometimes it's good to change the structure for other reasons, but like you're saying in the opening it's better to develop pieces.

Yes, since white wasn't posing a threat it's normal to develop pieces. In that variation of the Alapin, where black has already played d6, white has to play accurately. It used to be thought somewhat better for black and then in the 1980s it became fashionable for white to actually play into it deliberately, because one of the GM Alapin analysts found a few wrinkles around which white could base a game. I think it was more with the idea of confusing a black player who may have thought that 3. c3 shouldn't be good. It was thought by some to be a tiny edge for white but that was dubious.

I wouldn't have thought e5 is a good way to play as black. The idea would be to try to take advantage of white's having played c3. Now, if after e5, white can arrange to play d4, white should be better, or so I should think.

-

How I deal with trash hippo players... obviously the hippo itself isn't trash, but when playing anon games online I'm not exactly playing against David Bronstein. The hippo at this level is just some random garbage.

I've had more or less the same setup many times (up through move 14) so not original or anything... but reminded me of this topic.

we are well aware that alking about cheating is not allowed, i'm honestly surprised @Martin_Stahl hasn't locked the forum yet