I would answer this, but there is an unwritten rule on answering questions about unwritten rules.
Is There An Unwritten Rule Against Using A Thesaurus?

Please know that different words, while more or less synonymous in definition, are nonetheless used in different circumstances and contexts. Also, all words that are "synonymous" still usually deviate slightly in precise meaning.

So I understand it's altogether allowable to utilize a thesaurus in the forums, but I don't apperceive whether you, the community believe it's equitable, by cause of my confession to employing an onomasticon to an individual and they sumarily refused to engage me in discourse. Ruminations?
Hahaha +1 :DD

Excessive embellishment of verbal articulation can only but seduce the most Panic of fates.
(No thesaurus!) XD

Excessive embellishment of verbal articulation can only but seduce the most Panic of fates.
(No thesaurus!) XD
Is "the most Panic of fates" a hot female?

Excessive embellishment of verbal articulation can only but seduce the most Panic of fates.
(No thesaurus!) XD
Is "the most Panic of fates" a hot female?
why...?

Does the OP have peanut butter on the roof of his mouth??
does the indigenous anouncer harbor goober marmite on the cupola of his muzzle. i see how this works... but that took me a while.

Excessive embellishment of verbal articulation can only but seduce the most Panic of fates.
(No thesaurus!) XD
Is "the most Panic of fates" a hot female?
why...?
Because if it is then I need to start working on my excessive embellishment of verbal articulation.

Excessive embellishment of verbal articulation can only but seduce the most Panic of fates.
(No thesaurus!) XD
Is "the most Panic of fates" a hot female?
why...?
Because if it is then I need to start working on my excessive embellishment of verbal articulation.
A noble pursuit good sir.

Does the OP have peanut butter on the roof of his mouth??
does the indigenous anouncer harbor goober marmite on the cupola of his muzzle. i see how this works... but that took me a while.
is there an unwritten law about quoting one's own self and then laughing about how funny they think their comment was?

Does the OP have peanut butter on the roof of his mouth??
does the indigenous anouncer harbor goober marmite on the cupola of his muzzle. i see how this works... but that took me a while.
is there an unwritten law about quoting one's own self and then laughing about how funny they think their comment was?
Um... sort of. It's like laughing at your own jokes when nobody else is laughing.

Um... sort of. It's like laughing at your own jokes when nobody else is laughing.
i know they are not laughing because i am certain they are green with jealousy and red with rage.

Please know that different words, while more or less synonymous in definition, are nonetheless used in different circumstances and contexts. Also, all words that are "synonymous" still usually deviate slightly in precise meaning.
Context makes the word
http://enjoychesslearning.wordpress.com/

Um... sort of. It's like laughing at your own jokes when nobody else is laughing.
i know they are not laughing because i am certain they are green with jealousy and red with rage.
So they're grey?

Um... sort of. It's like laughing at your own jokes when nobody else is laughing.
i know they are not laughing because i am certain they are green with jealousy and red with rage.
So they're grey?
um, noo... green and red make brown i'm pretty sure. brown like pieces of... um i think the answer is brown.

Um... sort of. It's like laughing at your own jokes when nobody else is laughing.
i know they are not laughing because i am certain they are green with jealousy and red with rage.
So they're grey?
um, noo... green and red make brown i'm pretty sure. brown like pieces of... um i think the answer is brown.
That depends on whether the shades of red and green that you use are directly opposite each other on the color wheel. If they are directly opposite then combining them should (at least in theory) make grey.
So I understand it's altogether allowable to utilize a thesaurus in the forums, but I don't apperceive whether you, the community believe it's equitable, by cause of my confession to employing an onomasticon to an individual and they sumarily refused to engage me in discourse. Ruminations?