Live Chess Stats: A Painful Dilemna...

Sort:
Gerik

Whatever Erik decides is best is what i agree with. 

erik

why is spelling my name so hard?? :(

Gerik

sorry about that typo, Erik.Embarassed I wont let it happen again.

TheGrobe

Maybe he meant this Eric:

http://www.chess.com/members/view/eric

Nytik
erik wrote:

why is spelling my name so hard?? :(

I've actually reached the point where my brain sees Eric and thinks it's a spelling mistake! This is unfortunate, since it's the more common way to spell the name.

bondiggity

Anyway you could just reset everybody's Glicko RD? 

target1400
erik wrote:

after hearing everyone, this is 95% sure: wipe games and stats, keep ratings (rounded down to even 100), reset RD. we'll give everyone notice so they can download their games.


What is the reason for the rounding ?

ozzie_c_cobblepot

So if you're at 1690, you might as well keep trying to get to 1701, right?

TheGrobe

It does seem oddly arbitrary, and I'm not sure what it accomplishes.  It makes just as much sense as rounding to the nearest 1 (i.e. don't bother to reset ratings at all).

theriverman

Only Clean The Live Chess Ratings.

Leave the regular and 960 ratings alone.

ozzie_c_cobblepot
TheGrobe wrote:

It does seem oddly arbitrary, and I'm not sure what it accomplishes.  It makes just as much sense as rounding to the nearest 1 (i.e. don't bother to reset ratings at all).


I'm sure there's some reason.

erik
target1400 wrote:
erik wrote:

after hearing everyone, this is 95% sure: wipe games and stats, keep ratings (rounded down to even 100), reset RD. we'll give everyone notice so they can download their games.


What is the reason for the rounding ?


reduces the upward "drift" a little. also, rounded corners are pretty?

theriverman

Reset the Live Chess 1 Ratings , but give time to save the past Live Chess 1 games.

YellI have been through a year of bad connections, questionsable losses, and .....etc...

I would have to play another 3,ooo games to neutrualize the dark and  messed up days, months of Live Chess 1.

Cool

Heejo

i had a lot of disconnects and i will have tons of disconnects even if they bring out a perfect version but thats because of internet going out when somene calls, starting out new would be great just make that chess.com machine send a message forward to every1 that it will be reset and that every1 which wishes to keep his/her games should download the PGN seeming not every1 spends time on the forums..

hazenfelts

If the record of the games gets deleted then the number of games should still be recorded

Politicalmusic
Zug wrote:

I believe it would make the most sense to wipe out everything.  In that way you start the new Live Chess with a clean slate.  As a result, no one will be able to complain about anything, because it's all brand spanking new.

Regards, Zug


Yeah pretty much.

Politicalmusic

Eric you can't please everyone.  Although you try.  lol.  Unless you have some macro that gave everyone their last rating, start it over.  (Just send some warnings to tell folks to save their games if they want to keep them).

da_tornado

archive the old games and start a new achive for live chess 2.0

TheGrobe

We all started at 1200 -- what's the harm in doing it again.  Plus, haven't you been up-front about the intent to reset the ratings right from the start?

s7silver
da_tornado wrote:

archive the old games and start a new achive for live chess 2.0


I agree.  Who cares about the rating or the record, but lets save the games (preferable on the site rather than having to download them).

I often play from different computers and so having all of my games here on this site is really nice.  Once I download them it becomes a pain to go back to them.