Making the Chess.com Forums Better

Sort:
dauber_wins

 This thread has outlived its usefulness and purpose and will be locked.

Feel free to create threads to discuss this topic further.

Please refer to the original posting for a comprehensive explanation of new posting policies.

offensive/vulgar language.

•personal attacks.

•spammy/pointless/distracting posts.

•hijacking of threads with off-topic posts or images.

•discussion of illegal activities (drugs, etc).

•advertising competitive sites.

cheating


^^ I really don't see how our personal realationships are any of your business , chess.com!


Martin_Stahl
dauber_wins wrote:

 

...

•cheating


^^ I really don't see how our personal realationships are any of your business , chess.com!

 

 

That has absolutely nothing to do with with personal relationships (as you know).

 

It has to do with the following:

https://support.chess.com/customer/en/portal/articles/1444879-fair-play-on-chess-com-what-you-need-to-know

 

dauber_wins

Martin_Stahl wrote:

dauber_wins wrote:

 

...

•cheating


^^ I really don't see how our personal realationships are any of your business , chess.com!

 

 

That has absolutely nothing to do with with personal relationships (as you know).

 

It has to do with the following:

https://support.chess.com/customer/en/portal/articles/1444879-fair-play-on-chess-com-what-you-need-to-know

 

Are you calling me a liar? I dont click on unsolicited links.

macer75
dauber_wins wrote:

 

•cheating


^^ I really don't see how our personal realationships are any of your business , chess.com!


I think this rule is mostly for your own good. You never know when your spouse could sneak onto your chess.com account and see what you've been posting.

Martin_Stahl
dauber_wins wrote:

Are you calling me a liar? I dont click on unsolicited links.

 

What? 

dauber_wins

Martin_Stahl wrote:

dauber_wins wrote:

Are you calling me a liar? I dont click on unsolicited links.

 

What? 

you said as i know

Martin_Stahl

OK. The link I provided is a chess.com support link that directly relates to the bolded part of your post and the part I quoted. 

 

If you really don't understand what was meant by that term, as it relates to a chess website, then I apologize. 

dauber_wins

Martin_Stahl wrote:

OK. The link I provided is a chess.com support link that directly relates to the bolded part of your post and the part I quoted. 

 

If you really don't understand what was meant by that term, as it relates to a chess website, then I apologize. 

ok. just as long as you learned your lesson

macer75
dauber_wins wrote:
Martin_Stahl wrote:

OK. The link I provided is a chess.com support link that directly relates to the bolded part of your post and the part I quoted. 

 

If you really don't understand what was meant by that term, as it relates to a chess website, then I apologize. 

ok. just as long as you learned your lesson

Schooled!

HessianWarrior

You have been here 10 days so now you are damn expert on "Making the Chess.com Forums Better"?

RonaldJosephCote

  10 days and 22 threads. Embarassed

trysts

Great movie:)

trysts
HueyWilliams wrote:

Yes indeed.

Hey, this was cool! (from wikipedia)...

On March 10, the Long Beach earthquake hit while "The Shadow Waltz" was being filmed:

[it] caused a blackout and short-circuited some of the dancing violins. Berkeley was almost thrown from the camera boom, dangling by one hand until he could pull himself back up. He yelled for the girls, many of whom were on a 30-foot (9.1 m)-high platform, to sit down until technicians could get the soundstage doors open and let in some light.

Wow!