Mikhail Tal meme by chessmemex
Sort:
Ginarook wrote:
lol, talking about blunders, I played my worst game for a very long time yesterday.
I made so many blunders, including just not taking a free piece on move 18 , that was qxc4
Then I played 26...kg7, kind of about the worst move on the board ( nearly )
Does anyone else have this kind of awful game sometimes ?
I just couldn't seem to see anything I normally can
Haven't dared play another after that yet
I usually quit after blundering a piece or a queen but it would be very cool if you become my chess rival so I have the motivation to improve.
Ginarook wrote:
After that game lol ??
Sure we can play some games, but after that game, I don't actually trust my brain at the moment.
After I have got that back maybe
your rating is 1603 in rapids...you're better than me. I guess that's why you're showing your kicking pose to me...haha
Ginarook wrote:
Impatience ?
Maybe, I am not sure, that's why I asked if anyone else has had a similar experience.
It happens to me occasionally, but I don't really know why, my brain feels like its filled with cotton wool, or something like that ?
Maybe you were tired or thinking about assignments
Ginarook wrote:
Impatience ?
Maybe, I am not sure, that's why I asked if anyone else has had a similar experience.
It happens to me occasionally, but I don't really know why, my brain feels like its filled with cotton wool, or something like that ?
https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/38998125707?tab=analysis you'll be so scared to play against me if you see this game
Ginarook wrote:
lol, I play a similar line as white, so I would spoil all your fun with 3...d5
I started to love danish gambit after I saw naroditsky play it.
Ginarook wrote:
Yes, but its similar to this, which I play
1 e4 e5
2 nf3 nc6
3 d4 pxp
4 c3
and the real spoiler move is 4 ....d5 !
You know visualizations and notations?
Like can you recite lines what you play?
Feb 20, 2022
0
#10
Interesting point. The notation in algebraic is in my humble opinion less conducive to visualization than the old descriptive notation. I spend 2x every work day reading chess studying lines, often in descriptive. When the weekend comes I am supposed to take the board and place the pieces of the variations visualized during the week but I never do, too tired 
Feb 20, 2022
0
#11
Ginarook wrote:
Yes, but its similar to this, which I play
1 e4 e5
2 nf3 nc6
3 d4 pxp
4 c3
and the real spoiler move is 4 ....d5 !
d5 leads to an endgame where you can play b7 and Ba6 to stop white castling short. I feel, even though material is equal, that black has a better game. I won one of these today. You can check my history 
Feb 20, 2022
0
#12
Yeah that's it. It was abandoned by the early 80's. But the notation makes it easier than algebraic in my opinion to study lines.
boddythepoddy wrote:
Interesting point. The notation in algebraic is in my humble opinion less conducive to visualization than the old descriptive notation. I spend 2x every work day reading chess studying lines, often in descriptive. When the weekend comes I am supposed to take the board and place the pieces of the variations visualized during the week but I never do, too tired
i'm noob
Looks like a normal online blitz game to me ;-)
are you sure
boddythepoddy wrote:
Naroditsky's instructionals are pure gold
Naroditsky is a pure saint. He provides such a great content for free!
Feb 20, 2022
0
#18
Well @Ginarook, this just means there is a glimmer of hope for the rest of us.
