never understood any pie that is not a meat pie. maybe the bunny should listen more to the pies ...
New TOS - anyone read it yet?
Sort:
I don't like to associate cows with pies!
Pig pies? Nah 
Apr 26, 2020
0
#26
Martin_Stahl wrote:
Getting too off-topic, will often get topics move to that category.
we should be able to discuss serious stuff and have fun at the same time. at least that's how the bunny rolls.
Apr 26, 2020
0
#27
Plato-Potato wrote:
what if the thread goes back on topic after having gotten moved there ?
actually the op can always move it back though the mods might get upset
Apr 26, 2020
0
#28
52yrral wrote:
I don't like to associate cows with pies!
they're big in india. very artistic too
Apr 26, 2020
0
#30
Plato-Potato wrote:
thank god the mods can’t use tasers.
we'd need a tase receiver on our mice or touchpads for remote tasing to work
Apr 26, 2020
0
#31
autobunny wrote:
Martin_Stahl wrote:
From 2015: https://web.archive.org/web/20150102062844/https://www.chess.com/legal#termsofservice
That may actually be pretty close to when it was originally put in the TOS. So, nothing new.
I will say, that is one of the least moderated parts of the guidelines, but if it gets out of hand, it still can be.
looks like it was introduced at the end of 2014 - wow. dumb bunny.
this doesn't have it
https://web.archive.org/web/20141219054105/https://www.chess.com/legal
so back on topic, how did so many of us miss this? or only we losers on this thread?
Apr 26, 2020
0
#32
Plato-Potato wrote:
it’s cowpat, not cowpie.
pats and pies are a dangerous combo
Apr 26, 2020
0
#33
Plato-Potato wrote:
that’s rough! about the half-pike thing.
ok guys, do you think chesscom should have some kind of people’s court for debating important stuffs ? all in favour say “aye”.
aye
Apr 26, 2020
0
#34
autobunny wrote:
Plato-Potato wrote:
it’s cowpat, not cowpie.
pats and pies are a dangerous combo
RonaldJosephCote wrote:
Is that Vanna White?... I can tell by the dress. WHO would DO such a thing??
Pat, pat sajak
Apr 26, 2020
0
#35
autobunny wrote:
autobunny wrote:
Plato-Potato wrote:
it’s cowpat, not cowpie.
pats and pies are a dangerous combo
RonaldJosephCote wrote:
Is that Vanna White?... I can tell by the dress. WHO would DO such a thing??
Pat, pat sajak
Yes, it looks like Pat already had his pie and is returning the favour.
Apr 26, 2020
0
#36
m_connors wrote:
autobunny wrote:
*snip*
Yes, it looks like Pat already had his pie and is returning the favour.
pies have always been about sharing.
this is exactly the kind of to and fro we will be missing when this rule gets enforced.
remember folks, pies are always relevant.
Apr 26, 2020
0
#37
Caesar49bc wrote:
Lots of companies update their Terms of Service. Generally if there is a major change, they'll mention the changes.
Mostly, terms of services for companies are updated, usually once a year, just to make sure it's compatible with current laws, or perhaps even slightly loosen the TOS. But in any event, it's in companies best interest to make sure the newest TOS is roughly the same as the last one, if they feel they don't need to highlight any particular change.
Usually the biggest change, in my experience, is for companies to add "forced arbitration" to settle court cases. Even that's getting pretty rare, since the vast majority of companies already include that in their TOS.
Cases wise, it's up to the courts to determine on a case by case basis if a complaint can be done through arbitration or allow the lawsuit to continue in the courts. Companies can't force all lawsuits to go through arbitration, but it will add an onerous step to the process for any lawsuit, great for the pockets of lawyers. That being said, for an average company, the forced arbitration rule does keep the annual cost of defending legal actions to something manageable, since most complaints can be resolved with arbitration. The ones that are deemed, by a judge, suitable to go through the full court process generally are cases that meet a fairly high bar in the legal sense.
All hail Caesar. Thanks for the info.
The bunny is however not litigious in nature, nor in built up areas. It's more about what actions mods may take on the site itself.
Edit:
Looks like Caesar just got muted! What's happening???!!! Et tu Caesar?
Apr 26, 2020
0
#38
For e.g. something like this
Everyone knows how dumb the bunny is and how he often misinterprets words. Also the op in this case has not even responded to the thread for 2 weeks since his op.
Or this
https://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-showcase/2200-players-have-no-backbone#comment-48011102
The bunny is all about love.
Or this
The bunny just wants pets to be safe.
Does this make the bunny a bad bunny out just a dumb one?
What is OK and what is not?
And why did @Caesar49bc get muted?
I thought that was back uh, Ide say in March?
Cherry pie is one of my favorites too, in keeping with m_conners comments.