People Being RUDE!!!
Sort:
Karl_ wrote:
goldendog wrote:
No one has claimed that T3 was a scientific tool. Red Herring.
Likewise, a tool doesn't need to be scientific to produce valid results, in this case catching the most blatant cheaters.
That is so illogical, almost anyone should be able to see that. Sure, you don't need the correct tools to get results YOU may feel are valid. But then how do you defend your conclusions made, with them, to others? You can't! They will just laugh at you. Which happened when you went to off site forums.
I don't think you and logic have actually made acquaintance!
No one that understands T3 laughs at it; it isn't a 100% tool nor pretends to be. No one laughed at me that I recall either, who understood T3 as a proviso. Of course, a jackass will bray, Karl, but so what? Karl?
kramakintews wrote:
Karl_ wrote:
theoreticalboy wrote:
Choosing words with care
Karl defers explanation
Of what he means. Bah.
Yes, I choose my words
things we aren't to talk about
I do as please here
*applause*
Karl_ wrote:
kramakintews wrote:
Karl_ wrote:
theoreticalboy wrote:
Choosing words with care
Karl defers explanation
Of what he means. Bah.
Yes, I choose my words
things we aren't to talk about
I do as please here
Try to misquote me?
Shameful to omit context
Why you in my list?
Karl_ wrote:
Maybe laugh was the wrong word. Perhaps better is they slammed and discredited you. And some of them even came here to do so. Seems you caused C.c to have some new enemies we didn't really want. Proud of that?
Still fulla, Karl?
So far, no one's discredited T3 for what it is...a good tool to find blatant cheaters.
But feel free to twist the truth until it is congruent with that internal landscape of yours lol.
I think "saint" was your word, if I'm not mistaken, and I most definitely have biases.
I don't think I, or anyone else has claimed this.
My thinking here is that since you seem completely immune to reason and entirely unwilling to undertake even the slightest act of introspection, I don't see why I shouldn't have a little fun with this thread.
Karl_ wrote:
ilikeflags wrote:
bless you for starting this thread ivan. bless you
What no credit to me? You might want to read post 11.
And there is the nugget waiting to come out of the rough... proof of sublime narcissism... I have been waiting over a year for that tidbit to show proof...
B
http://www.psychforums.com/narcissistic-personality/topic52507.html
kramakintews wrote:
Karl_ wrote:
TheGrobe wrote:
Karl_ wrote:
kramakintews wrote:
Karl_ wrote:
theoreticalboy wrote:
Choosing words with care
Karl defers explanation
Of what he means. Bah.
Yes, I choose my words
things we aren't to talk about
I do as please here
Try to misquote me?
Shameful to omit context
Why you in my list?
I fail to understand why some here call you an unbiased Saint.
dang, only 16 syllables
It's not syllables but mora which are important, and in Japanese -n counts as an extra mora. So, ignoring the rest of the times where this rule has been entirely disregarded, we can claim this is true haiku 
Sep 27, 2010
0
#113
does karl belong 'mung
sweet sweet waffles waffles yum
yes sir, waffles yum.
But you're awesome at waffle appreciation!
Stick to what you know 'flags!
There once was a man from Nantucket...
Sep 27, 2010
0
#117
waffles waffles hey!
waffles waffles all the way.
nantucket waflfles!
There once was a man from Texas
who enjoyed waffles for breakfast.
He said TheGrobe is a saint
over his protests that he ain't.
'flags is leader, as I heard it, by divine right.