Shame on you trysts for arguing against someone who used a giant font! You should know that means they know everything.
Random use of capital letters and direct insults also adds credence to his point of view. Best you back down now trysts before he drops the forum A-bomb... coloured text!
* Shields eyes *
I like how our country trains people to defend us and also if you dont agree with him, he hreatens to shoot you. Some how i get the feeling you shouldnt be allowed near guns, ammunition, or anything dangerous.
Now on a personal note from me. My 18 year old daughter is in the airforce. She does not threaten to shoot people if they dont agree with her.
Obviously you have issues yu need to deal with. I suggest getting help.
In Chessmooster's vitriolic hatred of anyone not on his wing of the political spectrum, I recognise the same pathological psychology as on both sides of sectarian conflicts. Remember we are all human beings, open to intelligent (please note spelling) discussion and rational argument. Leave the tribal conflicts to our poorly educated distant ancestors.
Let me put it another way. It is wise, and civilised, to argue the facts, rather than being obscene towards those who voted differently to oneself. Unless you despise democracy and the right of others to freely express their views at the ballot box.
If the lack of respect to other people was due to shrapnel lodged in some key part of the brain, please accept my apologies and sympathy.
Oh, by the way, political discussion is banned.
Trysts,
If you can not realize who is arguing on the side of intellegence here, then let me make it clearer for you. Do evolution a favor and kill yourself, don't procreate, we have enough idiots in this world already. Next time, you TRY to argue with some one, load your pistol with something besides water. What an idiot, I am outta here!
I didn't try to argue with you. And I don't bring pistols to an argument.
"And I don't bring pistols to an argument."
"And I don't bring pistols to an argument."
If you can not realize who is arguing on the side of intellegence here, then let me make it clearer for you.
Start by learning how to spell intelligence. I guess the previous quotes trying to point that out to you have been too subtle.
Man, I can't wait until Texas finally secedes and we're rid of a lot of his brain-dead types.
Hey, I didn't look at her! I have a nice girlfriend, I don't want yours! Please don't shoot! You're in control! You don't need to do this! My country is small, it has close to no military force! We're friendly people, we mean you no harm! Don't be scared!
"peace in our time"... piece of czecho- slovakia , piece of Poland, piece of Russia. pieces of France and anything else we want ...
I've always thought of Chamberlain as a wimp, and instinctively felt with the benefit of hindsight that Britain should have declared war on Germany earlier. However, it is quite enlightening to look over the timeline of events again. I have added some fictitious but (as far as I understand) thematic quotes to clarify the change in the situation.
Chamberlain, 1938 - "Mr. Hitler, we won't go to war with you if you don't invade any more countries"
Roosevelt, 1938 - "Don't waste my time with foreign affairs, don't you know we've got a recession going on? Lend them some money and let them get on with it"
September 1, 1939 - Hitler invades Poland
September 3, 1939 - Chamberlain declares war against Germany.
Roosevelt, 1939 - "Is there some sort of war on?"
Roosevelt, 1940 - "However many European countries Hitler invades, it's not our problem"
Roosevelt, 1941 - "Must brush up on my German, looks like the whole of Europe including Britain will be speaking it soon"
Dec 11 1941 - Hitler declares war on the US
Roosevelt, Dec 12 1941 - "What did you do that for?"
In Chessmooster's vitriolic hatred of anyone not on his wing of the political spectrum, I recognise the same pathological psychology as on both sides of sectarian conflicts. Remember we are all human beings, open to intelligent (please note spelling) discussion and rational argument. Leave the tribal conflicts to our poorly educated distant ancestors.
Let me put it another way. It is wise, and civilised, to argue the facts, rather than being obscene towards those who voted differently to oneself. Unless you despise democracy and the right of others to freely express their views at the ballot box.
If the lack of respect to other people was due to shrapnel lodged in some key part of the brain, please accept my apologies and sympathy.
Oh, by the way, political discussion is banned.
Oh, by the way, political discussion is banned. Please!
Amen!
Shame on you trysts for arguing against someone who used a giant font! You should know that means they know everything.