16211 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Get a life! How hard can it be?
How hard can it be to play somebody else?
How hard can it be to stop being needy? Good luck with women, lol.
I think it's rude to accept rematches because I like to not accept rematches so anyone who likes to accept rematches has different preferences than me and is therefore a really bad person. (sarcasm)
Rematches are a sign of arrogance.
Once again, every real life player will give you rematch buth this here is different, 99% here never play rating chess tournaments, only online !!
In OTB Rated tournament you don´t give rematchs...
Unless you are playing in the World Cup, the Candidates or you are playing a match for the world championship.
Lol !! Btw i dont know what is OTB but what i want to say that almost any player that play real rating chess will give you here rematch in blitz BECAUSE of chess codex and fair play ( and to add never will play Q vs Q or R vs R like almost all here do ). To be more precise, players with at least 2200 and with many tournaments and games played, no amateurs
any player that play real rating chess will give you here rematch in blitz BECAUSE of chess codex and fair play
Very funny, ofc i dont expect that amateurs like you understand that
Oh wow!!...He called me Amateur!!! .....
Well, I think amateurs like me and the OP of this topic won't understand it.
Farewell everyone... he hurt my feelings.. ... Oh wait!!... I am one...
Good luck with your codex.
lol, by your logic a player 2201 is totally different from a 2199...the 2199 doesn't "understand that".
A real chess master would never generalize like that, especially towards "amateur players".
Even here you are amateur with 1348 rating, i think you wanted to say by joking that i am amateur too but i am not . With almost 50 in october, learn to play when i was 5-6, playing semi professional from 16, beating some of GM and many IM in tournaments ofc you dont understand my point like 99% of amateurs here ( to better understand, real players play on the other well known site, even from my country there is not a single player here, only notice IM Nikola Nestorovic but i think that he dont play here, only registred ! ). And because i know that you will ask, i play here because much weaker player here, did not play bltz 3-4 years and many blunders in last 6-7 years in tournaments because my dad eyes muscules, so i just trying to came back with blitz to see better tactics and came back to real tournament chess, internet chess is for ...
Oh yeah, and only rematches if I want it, of course.
If I beat I higher rated player, (i just did with 2100+), then I don't want a rematch (he offered one) because a scalp is just that and enough for me. That good feeling will stay there if you run.
Higher rated players get their chance to beat you the first time, if they lose it, then too bad for them.
If a player wins and wants a rematch, it's still up to the loser whether or not he would like a rematch, If he does, everyone's happy. If he doesn't, then the winner gets 1-0, and I don't see why anyone would be unhappy about that.
Also, the argument about having white and black once is ridiculous. How many rating points does the difference in results in playing white vs black result in? You don't need to be a genius to guess that it's very small, and a player rated around 30 points above you can hardly be rated higher enough to be noticably better. A truly better player wins with both white or black.
I meant with at least 2200-2250 with 15-20 years playing chess in that level
so i just trying to came back with blitz to see better tactics and came back to real tournament chess, internet chess is for ...
yes exactly, so stop whining about people not giving you a rematch
First, only real ratings are by Fide, seccond- blitz chess is just for fun and relaxing, no real chess, third - internet chess is just for fun and relaxing but i understand your amateur thoughts to get couple of points and dont want to play anymore but you dont understand that you will learn 10 times more if you play 10 games with him ( and lose all, no metter !! ).
Yes, but i need a couple of years more here for chess because i am playing poker now, so i will continue to whining but not so for rematches but for players that are playing Q vs Q and R vs R . You amateurs never will understand this because you never played real chess, bye !
I've been playing seriously for only 3 years total (less than 2 if you count my gaps).
You're lucky to have learned chess @5-6. I didn't even know how to move a knight until I was like 12.
lol, why use my lowest online standard rating (with only 1 game, 1 win vs a player around 1200, you'd have the same rating) when you clearly say "internet chess is for...." Wow. And my OTB is 600 points higher.
...And I wasn't going to ask "why do you play on this site?" nor did I think I gave any indication I was going to. You seem insecure about playing on this site with us "weaker" players. And this has nothing to do with rematches.
I'll make a prediction. I'll be @ least 2200 otb by the time I go to college... That's in 2.5 years and +<300 points.
Real chess players know that OTB is "over the board".
lol...national rating systems are good enough for me ("only real ratings..FIDE"). They're convertable too, and pretty accurate in regards to FIDE.
You don't understand our amateur thoughts because you haven't been an amateur for many years! You have no idea what amateurs think like! Also, it's obvious you have complete contempt for amateurs.
I definitely learned from slow and even rapid games against good opposition, but nothing from bullet.
If you (amazing master) know how to get real improvement from bullet games (the only time control in which you can have time to play "10 games") then please reveal your secret!
" The Call of the Wild with IM Danny Rensch!"
by juffure a few minutes ago
double-knight sac, bishop-sac, queen-sac, king-sac???
by 1NaturalDisaster a few minutes ago
why engine in suggesting h4 on move 6?
by Fiveofswords 2 minutes ago
2/8/2016 - Missing The Obvious
by HollowHorn 9 minutes ago
This $3.00 endgame book is better than Fundamental Chess ENdings
by SilentKnighte5 20 minutes ago
Regular chess game against the computer
by petterig 20 minutes ago
Did "Rapid Chess Improvement" by Michael de la Maza work for you?
by SilentKnighte5 22 minutes ago
2/8/2016 - Neumann-Hernandez Dresden 1969
by Ledgermayne1234 24 minutes ago
Who will win Candidates 2016
by Rational_Optimist 36 minutes ago
Interactive/comparative historical charts of top Fide players
by TurboFish 37 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!