Revolutionary Activity on Chess.com

Shoud revolutionary activity be allowed on chess.com? 

I've recently been associated in a series of forums suggesting the beginnings of possible revolutionary movements led by chess.com member snakesbelly, who wants to change the game of chess as a whole.

I find this as a threat to the chess.com community and to the global community of chess-players as a whole.

Can anyone intervene? 

ALL TALK====HE WILL NEVER DO ITAND NEVER GET IT THROUGH FIDE===

So why the crying face? You should be happy.

Chess has evolved a lot over the centuries, so why do people seem so strongly against chess variants?  If FIDE exsisted in the 1500's (or 1600's?), we'd still have queens that move 1 square and maybe even pawns that move just 1 square.  At least if pawns moved 1 square we wouldn't have to think about En Passant.

ROTFPMSL  chess aint broke. No need to change it, it doesnt need fixing! lol.  Fischer thought chess360 would overtake chess. He was wrong.