suggest provisional rating marked as such


Excellent idea!


confusion can be cleared by faq on:
1. why RD, why not SD?
2. What is the big deal about this bayesian thing? Rev. Bayes's theorem is that trivial a posteriori probablility theorem, isn't it? We did that at junior high school :D
3. Why do some bayesians get on the defensive and call their probabilities 'likelihoods'?
Or just post a link to late Ed Jaynes's unfinished public-domain book :)
I suggest provisional rating be displayed as eg 1914[P] or something.
for example i am rated 1914 or so as i write this but ive played only 11 games [won all] -- i didnt know where i stood so i started out so midgame i realised i was playing weak opps.
So 1914 is misleading. 1914(P) would make ppl look - and maybe search faqs to see what (P) means, if implemented.
[ i know - glicko and all - it should eventually even out - but at corespondence it may take years plus no site i know including this one uses unmodified glicko - there are adhoc modifications to glicko not backed up by analysis.]