The absolute state of chess dot com censorship

Sort:
Avatar of Gr33nPawn

Yeah those youngsters are out of their minds, you might say h@mo and they will think you are racist nowdays, just brainless stuff! XD

Avatar of RoobieRoo
LieutenantFrankColumbo wrote:
RoobieRoo wrote:
LieutenantFrankColumbo wrote:

You agreed to the site rules when you joined correct?

The thread is not about my acceptance of site rules. How this could have evaded your keen powers of observation I cannot say.

What it actually about is overt censorship of perfectly normal and acceptable terms due to the employment of a low effort system that has zero contextual understanding and which actually creates censorship where none is needed robbing users of the ability to discuss and express themselves without resorting to evasive strategies.

If you have an issue with the site then you should address the site owners/developers/etc directly.

Past experience has taught me that you get much better results that way as opposed to just venting in a public forum. Even after all of that. You agreed to the TOS when you joined.

Not saying you dont have a valid complaint. Just better ways of handling it.

Just my .02

I am not trying to save the world. The purpose of this thread was to highlight the absurdity of a system of censorship that censors perfectly acceptable English words, phrases and idioms. Its infantile and entirely ludicrous for adult sentient beings to have to evade a system that censors perfectly good words.

Ok I understand that the main forums have to be ultra sanitised in case some advertiser or parent baulks at the prospect of some boorish cad who decides to engage in lewd and dastardly conduct by spewing forth an expletive laden tirade. We get that.

However in the more private clubs we discuss things of a more controversial nature and the censorship as it stands is debilitating. Here is just one final example. We can't say r*pe and as a consequence cannot link to any of the admirable charities or statistics produced when engaged in debate. For example, all the following are contraband.

Perfectly acceptable wholesome sites are being censored and excluded, in effect punishing the conscientious because of the behaviour of miscreants. Why you think that advantageous I cannot say.

Avatar of RoobieRoo
Gr33nPawn wrote:

Yeah those youngsters are out of their minds, you might say h@mo and they will think you are racist nowdays, just brainless stuff! XD

Indeed one dare not light a match lest someone calls the fire brigade to have it extinguished.

Avatar of sawdof
RoobieRoo wrote:

... Who on earth thought this a good idea?

If we dare to post an excerpt from a third party its gets censored and we must trawl through the entire text trying to identify the nefarious word in order to amend it to bypass censorship of readily understood and PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE English terms and phrases. ...

Avatar of DreamscapeHorizons

If u think this sites censorship is bad then try to comment about ANYTHING on msn.com that doesn't bow down & worship whatever lie they're pushing in any article. If they had an article about how our planet is really flat & u tried to point out ANY evidence to the contrary they'd give u a message about how it's against the terms of service & they're not allowing it. This site has a few similarities.

Avatar of Gr33nPawn

Reddit is the most toxic place on the net imo, they may shadowban you for no reason unable to do anything, but i think that's they way they are trying to push anything on the net

Avatar of LieutenantFrankColumbo

This site is the extent of my social media existence.

Avatar of Honchkrowabcd
RoobieRoo wrote:
Honchkrowabcd wrote:

the word you are saying is a racial slur?

In the context its a racial slur? Are you in your senses?

99% of the time it is used as a racial slur, and in the case of the 1% there are many other ways you could get the point across. There's no good way to block one without blocking the other so blocking both is just the best way

Avatar of Gr33nPawn

Stop speaking b@ll@cks already, we had enough of this bad word crap, all of this is just pretext to censor freedom of speech,

If you are so sensitive about the way people speak on the net then get out and touch some grass because in no way is reasonable to censor any word in the human vocabulary that resembles a slur word, do you get that?!

Avatar of RoobieRoo
Honchkrowabcd wrote:
RoobieRoo wrote:
Honchkrowabcd wrote:

the word you are saying is a racial slur?

In the context its a racial slur? Are you in your senses?

99% of the time it is used as a racial slur, and in the case of the 1% there are many other ways you could get the point across. There's no good way to block one without blocking the other so blocking both is just the best way

You are censoring perfectly acceptable language and preventing people from using idiomatic phrases that have been used throughout the literally world for hundreds of years with NO ISSUE for fear that some scoundrel might utter a racial slur! Oh noooooo!

Whats next, a social credit system where you get credits for visiting your granny?

Avatar of DreamscapeHorizons

Yep. The message from censors is really "bow down & grovel to your slave masters..... but ONLY some of you".

Avatar of RandomChessPlayer62
Honchkrowabcd wrote:
RoobieRoo wrote:
Honchkrowabcd wrote:

the word you are saying is a racial slur?

In the context its a racial slur? Are you in your senses?

99% of the time it is used as a racial slur, and in the case of the 1% there are many other ways you could get the point across. There's no good way to block one without blocking the other so blocking both is just the best way

Where is the line drawn? Shall we have to stop saying “Monkey” or “Ape” in perfectly fine contexts because racists use them as ethnic slurs?

Avatar of RandomChessPlayer62

Any word could be an ethnic slur if racists used it as such! Shall we have to destroy most of the English language to the point where barely any thoughts can be expressed in a wild attempt to prevent discrimination?!

Avatar of RandomChessPlayer62

Shall we all speak in “Happy speak” where no negativity exists within the vocabulary just in case?!

Avatar of DreamscapeHorizons
RandomChessPlayer62 wrote

Where is the line drawn? Shall we have to stop saying “Monkey” or “Ape” in perfectly fine contexts because racists use them as ethnic slurs?

This really happened: a few years ago on live TV a tennis commentator was commenting while Venus Williams was playing & said something like "she's using guerrilla warfare tactics". Something like that. He was fired immediately. Period. Even though it wasn't a description of gorilla the ape but guerrilla warfare strategy, a legitimate strategy of battle. It just shows how ignorant the censors are. Often (most of the time), it's the censors themselves that are projecting, they're the ones harboring the thoughts and assumptions that they're accusing others of.

Avatar of LieutenantFrankColumbo

Their is no such thing as a "bad" word

Avatar of LieutenantFrankColumbo

It comes down to context and how someone's uses a word.

Avatar of Gr33nPawn
RandomChessPlayer62 wrote:

Any word could be an ethnic slur if racists used it as such! Shall we have to destroy most of the English language to the point where barely any thoughts can be expressed in a wild attempt to prevent discrimination?!

Exactly, at some point in the future we may have the word banana becoming a slur word which for anybody may insinuate something bad or whatever, are we going to censor that also?!

I think in the end maybe it is for the better, people should throw their phones to the trash and get out

Avatar of RonaldJosephCote

Sorry,....I was gonna post something but a moderator put his hand on my shoulder. surprise

Avatar of Gr33nPawn

Nah Batman not so cool