He probably had chat blocked before the game started
You were still winning but you lost on time.
This is why it's pointless playing on this site
Sort:
I’m sorry to say it, but this loss is on you. You were up on time and winning, but you let your time run out. Your opponent is a legitimate 1600, which means they can still make mistakes. Grandmasters sometimes blunder mate in one. Your opponent can choose to play on if they want. Sometimes it has good results, sometimes it doesn’t. However, that’s for them to decide.
1 day ago
0
#5
He is questioning pidixtras1704 real competence in ches game. Is it realy what we know as a 1665 on chess.com? Because the guy blundered like a 1000, pushed some buttons off a other buttons on, then started playing like he is around... what? ... a nearly 2000 on this site? He dominates the 1600s when it suits him, opening an account for the ocasions. At least it is what it AnnaHar2012 is pointing at. That Rb8 by the way was just the first stone for a powerful and beautiful back rank + vertical atack strategy. Clearing the way on the f file as setting the red carpet for the waiting Queen to enter, only after the King's Rook show the Royal Power completes the tactics arranjement. Of course it's up to each one of us to evaluate this type of identity and use of the site situation. Quite frankly, we have a handful of htis sort of problems here. And if AnnaHar is right, pidixtras1704 his having a good time in his own amusement park.
1 day ago
0
#6
David, thank you for your thoughtful explanation. You are maybe right, maybe not…The only thing which might happen next - chesscom will catch this guy.
1 day ago
0
#7
David8x8x8x8 wrote:
He is questioning pidixtras1704 real competence in ches game. Is it realy what we know as a 1665 on chess.com? Because the guy blundered like a 1000, pushed some buttons off a other buttons on, then started playing like he is around... what? ... a nearly 2000 on this site? He dominates the 1600s when it suits him, opening an account for the ocasions. At least it is what it AnnaHar2012 is pointing at. That Rb8 by the way was just the first stone for a powerful and beautiful back rank + vertical atack strategy. Clearing the way on the f file as setting the red carpet for the waiting Queen to enter, only after the King's Rook show the Royal Power completes the tactics arranjement. Of course it's up to each one of us to evaluate this type of identity and use of the site situation. Quite frankly, we have a handful of htis sort of problems here. And if AnnaHar is right, pidixtras1704 his having a good time in his own amusement park.
This strikes me as a classic example of observer bias. The opponent's blunder is regarded as 'true' and a marker of their 'actual' level (even though it was probably a result of an ill-advised pre-move). Then all subsequent play is judged against this perceived standard. OP blunders their own knight on move 15, leaving it hanging just as much as their opponent did theirs. But the opponent seeing this and taking it is now seen as implausibly perfect play from a player who 'should' be incapable of spotting a hanging piece. Rather than two players at the same level making equally bad blunders, this is now characterised as clear cheating by one party, when there's no evidence of anything of the kind.
The OP has left the building after 15 hours and one game played.
New accounts complaining about new accounts
🤔 Strange
1 day ago
0
#10
Not everyone wants to chatter away during the game, they just want to make moves as mentioned they had probably had chat turned off before any play I would suggest being lest sceptical about your opponents play and his or her against there opponents and concentrate on your moves and then not become a victim of imagination!??
AnnaHar2012 wrote:
This is my very first game. A much weaker opponent blunders a piece immediately for no reason, muted chat, blocked me, and decided to "play on". Guess who wins less than 20 moves later.
Chess: pidixtras1704 vs AnnaHar2012 - 138723160808 - Chess.com
His account, of course, is a day old. Despite not seeing that he had blundered a bishop as soon as move 3, like a 1000, he somehow finds a way to win the vast majority of his games against 1600s.
I'm not sticking around for more of the chess.com experience.
This doesn't make any sense, he is a weaker opponent, and yet beats you, he is not worthy of being a 1000, and yet beats 1600s, something doesn't add up, and I think it might be you.
Pawnwiser657 wrote:
Not everyone wants to chatter away during the game, they just want to make moves as mentioned they had probably had chat turned off before any play I would suggest being lest sceptical about your opponents play and his or her against there opponents and concentrate on your moves and then not become a victim of imagination!??
True, I always have chat off now. I find this thread very strange - a player played one match, got angry the opponent didn't resign after an error in a Blitz game, went on to lose (showing resigning would be wrong), wrote thread post about it, and then deleted their account after one match ever? This is not healthy mental behaviour. 
NoemiS05 wrote:
Pawnwiser657 wrote:
Not everyone wants to chatter away during the game, they just want to make moves as mentioned they had probably had chat turned off before any play I would suggest being lest sceptical about your opponents play and his or her against there opponents and concentrate on your moves and then not become a victim of imagination!??
True, I always have chat off now. I find this thread very strange - a player played one match, got angry the opponent didn't resign after an error in a Blitz game, went on to lose (showing resigning would be wrong), wrote thread post about it, and then deleted their account after one match ever? This is not healthy mental behaviour.
LOL I refuse to resign out of spite all the time, Gotham's advice for beginners is to never resign, assuming your opponent is morally obligated to resign is just messed up, just another sore loser whining again.
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
NoemiS05 wrote:
Pawnwiser657 wrote:
Not everyone wants to chatter away during the game, they just want to make moves as mentioned they had probably had chat turned off before any play I would suggest being lest sceptical about your opponents play and his or her against there opponents and concentrate on your moves and then not become a victim of imagination!??
True, I always have chat off now. I find this thread very strange - a player played one match, got angry the opponent didn't resign after an error in a Blitz game, went on to lose (showing resigning would be wrong), wrote thread post about it, and then deleted their account after one match ever? This is not healthy mental behaviour.
LOL I refuse to resign out of spite all the time, Gotham's advice for beginners is to never resign, assuming your opponent is morally obligated to resign is just messed up, just another sore loser whining again.
Yeah, resigning is always a losing move! There's even examples of GMs playing on and the other GM making a blunder. At my level, some people don't even know how to checkmate other than ladder mate too...
NoemiS05 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
NoemiS05 wrote:
Pawnwiser657 wrote:
Not everyone wants to chatter away during the game, they just want to make moves as mentioned they had probably had chat turned off before any play I would suggest being lest sceptical about your opponents play and his or her against there opponents and concentrate on your moves and then not become a victim of imagination!??
True, I always have chat off now. I find this thread very strange - a player played one match, got angry the opponent didn't resign after an error in a Blitz game, went on to lose (showing resigning would be wrong), wrote thread post about it, and then deleted their account after one match ever? This is not healthy mental behaviour.
LOL I refuse to resign out of spite all the time, Gotham's advice for beginners is to never resign, assuming your opponent is morally obligated to resign is just messed up, just another sore loser whining again.
Yeah, resigning is always a losing move! There's even examples of GMs playing on and the other GM making a blunder. At my level, some people don't even know how to checkmate other than ladder mate too...
Whenever I am like "Man why doesn't he resign already, were goanna be here all day" I always end up losing, probably because I get distracted, you play one game, lose, get mad, decide it is all rigged, and quit, don't be so open minded that your brains fall out, and don't be so closed minded that the implode.
1 day ago
0
#16
AnnaHar2012 wrote:
This is my very first game. A much weaker opponent blunders a piece immediately for no reason, muted chat, blocked me, and decided to "play on". Guess who wins less than 20 moves later.
Chess: pidixtras1704 vs AnnaHar2012 - 138723160808 - Chess.com
His account, of course, is a day old. Despite not seeing that he had blundered a bishop as soon as move 3, like a 1000, he somehow finds a way to win the vast majority of his games against 1600s.
I'm not sticking around for more of the chess.com experience.
At least stick around for the bunny boohoo.
Boohoo
NoemiS05 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
NoemiS05 wrote:
Pawnwiser657 wrote:
Not everyone wants to chatter away during the game, they just want to make moves as mentioned they had probably had chat turned off before any play I would suggest being lest sceptical about your opponents play and his or her against there opponents and concentrate on your moves and then not become a victim of imagination!??
True, I always have chat off now. I find this thread very strange - a player played one match, got angry the opponent didn't resign after an error in a Blitz game, went on to lose (showing resigning would be wrong), wrote thread post about it, and then deleted their account after one match ever? This is not healthy mental behaviour.
LOL I refuse to resign out of spite all the time, Gotham's advice for beginners is to never resign, assuming your opponent is morally obligated to resign is just messed up, just another sore loser whining again.
Yeah, resigning is always a losing move! There's even examples of GMs playing on and the other GM making a blunder. At my level, some people don't even know how to checkmate other than ladder mate too...
Haven't seen you in a while
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
NoemiS05 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
NoemiS05 wrote:
Pawnwiser657 wrote:
Not everyone wants to chatter away during the game, they just want to make moves as mentioned they had probably had chat turned off before any play I would suggest being lest sceptical about your opponents play and his or her against there opponents and concentrate on your moves and then not become a victim of imagination!??
True, I always have chat off now. I find this thread very strange - a player played one match, got angry the opponent didn't resign after an error in a Blitz game, went on to lose (showing resigning would be wrong), wrote thread post about it, and then deleted their account after one match ever? This is not healthy mental behaviour.
LOL I refuse to resign out of spite all the time, Gotham's advice for beginners is to never resign, assuming your opponent is morally obligated to resign is just messed up, just another sore loser whining again.
Yeah, resigning is always a losing move! There's even examples of GMs playing on and the other GM making a blunder. At my level, some people don't even know how to checkmate other than ladder mate too...
Haven't seen you in a while
I've recently recovered from a "I hate chess, I give up" phase. But now I'm back and ready to win!
1 day ago
0
#19
NoemiS05 написал:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
NoemiS05 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
NoemiS05 wrote:
Pawnwiser657 wrote:
Not everyone wants to chatter away during the game, they just want to make moves as mentioned they had probably had chat turned off before any play I would suggest being lest sceptical about your opponents play and his or her against there opponents and concentrate on your moves and then not become a victim of imagination!??
True, I always have chat off now. I find this thread very strange - a player played one match, got angry the opponent didn't resign after an error in a Blitz game, went on to lose (showing resigning would be wrong), wrote thread post about it, and then deleted their account after one match ever? This is not healthy mental behaviour.
LOL I refuse to resign out of spite all the time, Gotham's advice for beginners is to never resign, assuming your opponent is morally obligated to resign is just messed up, just another sore loser whining again.
Yeah, resigning is always a losing move! There's even examples of GMs playing on and the other GM making a blunder. At my level, some people don't even know how to checkmate other than ladder mate too...
Haven't seen you in a while
I've recently recovered from a "I hate chess, I give up" phase. But now I'm back and ready to win!
Great position for a real winner! Good luck!
Leto wrote:
NoemiS05 написал:
BigChessplayer665 wrote:
NoemiS05 wrote:
Mid-KnightRider wrote:
NoemiS05 wrote:
Pawnwiser657 wrote:
Not everyone wants to chatter away during the game, they just want to make moves as mentioned they had probably had chat turned off before any play I would suggest being lest sceptical about your opponents play and his or her against there opponents and concentrate on your moves and then not become a victim of imagination!??
True, I always have chat off now. I find this thread very strange - a player played one match, got angry the opponent didn't resign after an error in a Blitz game, went on to lose (showing resigning would be wrong), wrote thread post about it, and then deleted their account after one match ever? This is not healthy mental behaviour.
LOL I refuse to resign out of spite all the time, Gotham's advice for beginners is to never resign, assuming your opponent is morally obligated to resign is just messed up, just another sore loser whining again.
Yeah, resigning is always a losing move! There's even examples of GMs playing on and the other GM making a blunder. At my level, some people don't even know how to checkmate other than ladder mate too...
Haven't seen you in a while
I've recently recovered from a "I hate chess, I give up" phase. But now I'm back and ready to win!
Great position for a real winner! Good luck!
Yes! tht is the attitude!
This is my very first game. A much weaker opponent blunders a piece immediately for no reason, muted chat, blocked me, and decided to "play on". Guess who wins less than 20 moves later.
Chess: pidixtras1704 vs AnnaHar2012 - 138723160808 - Chess.com
His account, of course, is a day old. Despite not seeing that he had blundered a bishop as soon as move 3, like a 1000, he somehow finds a way to win the vast majority of his games against 1600s.
I'm not sticking around for more of the chess.com experience.