ok some of yall are just glazing at this point
This Is Wrong Chess.com
Imo, the situation was avoidable, but the top blogger removal is definitely a harsh punishment for something isn't against the rules. But then again, chess.com staff gave Hornet top blogger, so they have the right to remove it.
Its literally a banner on a private website
Real, I think if it happened to me it wouldn't be that big of a deal but for other people it is different.
Not just that, Hornet will get less views because its not on the top of the blogs page or the today page.
Ok... so what? Posting blogs for cc has no actual value. Views don't matter, and neither does the status of tb. I think removing hornets tb was excessive, but that doesn't mean anything of importance was lost. It's only an argument of principle, no real harm imo
Ok, very good point, so why are we here? If TB is not a big deal, why is there 350 comments here? Looks like we are making a huge deal of this, with Hornet not having TB. Top Blogger, must have been some kind of status for all of us to be auguring about it.
Imo, the situation was avoidable, but the top blogger removal is definitely a harsh punishment for something isn't against the rules. But then again, chess.com staff gave Hornet top blogger, so they have the right to remove it.
Its literally a banner on a private website
Real, I think if it happened to me it wouldn't be that big of a deal but for other people it is different.
Not just that, Hornet will get less views because its not on the top of the blogs page or the today page.
Ok... so what? Posting blogs for cc has no actual value. Views don't matter, and neither does the status of tb. I think removing hornets tb was excessive, but that doesn't mean anything of importance was lost. It's only an argument of principle, no real harm imo
Ok, very good point, so why are we here? If TB is not a big deal, why is there 350 comments here? Looks like we are making a huge deal of this, with Hornet not having TB. Top Blogger, must have been some kind of status for all of us to be auguring about it.
Because everyone is just glazing and just blindly agreeing with the crowd
Imo, the situation was avoidable, but the top blogger removal is definitely a harsh punishment for something isn't against the rules. But then again, chess.com staff gave Hornet top blogger, so they have the right to remove it.
Its literally a banner on a private website
Real, I think if it happened to me it wouldn't be that big of a deal but for other people it is different.
Not just that, Hornet will get less views because its not on the top of the blogs page or the today page.
Ok... so what? Posting blogs for cc has no actual value. Views don't matter, and neither does the status of tb. I think removing hornets tb was excessive, but that doesn't mean anything of importance was lost. It's only an argument of principle, no real harm imo
Ok, very good point, so why are we here? If TB is not a big deal, why is there 350 comments here? Looks like we are making a huge deal of this, with Hornet not having TB. Top Blogger, must have been some kind of status for all of us to be auguring about it.
Because everyone is just glazing and just blindly agreeing with the crowd
Yes
Imo, the situation was avoidable, but the top blogger removal is definitely a harsh punishment for something isn't against the rules. But then again, chess.com staff gave Hornet top blogger, so they have the right to remove it.
Its literally a banner on a private website
Real, I think if it happened to me it wouldn't be that big of a deal but for other people it is different.
Not just that, Hornet will get less views because its not on the top of the blogs page or the today page.
Ok... so what? Posting blogs for cc has no actual value. Views don't matter, and neither does the status of tb. I think removing hornets tb was excessive, but that doesn't mean anything of importance was lost. It's only an argument of principle, no real harm imo
Ok, very good point, so why are we here? If TB is not a big deal, why is there 350 comments here? Looks like we are making a huge deal of this, with Hornet not having TB. Top Blogger, must have been some kind of status for all of us to be auguring about it.
Because everyone is just glazing and just blindly agreeing with the crowd
Yes
This kinda thing happens a lot on chess.com, especially within this community. Trust me
Imo, the situation was avoidable, but the top blogger removal is definitely a harsh punishment for something isn't against the rules. But then again, chess.com staff gave Hornet top blogger, so they have the right to remove it.
Its literally a banner on a private website
Real, I think if it happened to me it wouldn't be that big of a deal but for other people it is different.
Not just that, Hornet will get less views because its not on the top of the blogs page or the today page.
Ok... so what? Posting blogs for cc has no actual value. Views don't matter, and neither does the status of tb. I think removing hornets tb was excessive, but that doesn't mean anything of importance was lost. It's only an argument of principle, no real harm imo
Ok, very good point, so why are we here? If TB is not a big deal, why is there 350 comments here? Looks like we are making a huge deal of this, with Hornet not having TB. Top Blogger, must have been some kind of status for all of us to be auguring about it.
Because everyone is just glazing and just blindly agreeing with the crowd
Yes
This kinda thing happens a lot on chess.com, especially within this community. Trust me
Yeah, we made our point on whether Hornet should have been demoted or not, this whole forum thing, like Twitter or all of internet tbh, got out of hand.
The OP could of done research 2 months before he posted his blog...... https://www.chess.com/forum/view/community/is-an-adolf-hitler-profile-picture-okay-with-chess-com-rules?sort=desc
Imo, the situation was avoidable, but the top blogger removal is definitely a harsh punishment for something isn't against the rules. But then again, chess.com staff gave Hornet top blogger, so they have the right to remove it.
Its literally a banner on a private website
Real, I think if it happened to me it wouldn't be that big of a deal but for other people it is different.
Not just that, Hornet will get less views because its not on the top of the blogs page or the today page.
Ok... so what? Posting blogs for cc has no actual value. Views don't matter, and neither does the status of tb. I think removing hornets tb was excessive, but that doesn't mean anything of importance was lost. It's only an argument of principle, no real harm imo
Ok, very good point, so why are we here? If TB is not a big deal, why is there 350 comments here? Looks like we are making a huge deal of this, with Hornet not having TB. Top Blogger, must have been some kind of status for all of us to be auguring about it.
Because everyone is just glazing and just blindly agreeing with the crowd
Yes
This kinda thing happens a lot on chess.com, especially within this community. Trust me
Yeah, we made our point on whether Hornet should have been demoted or not, this whole forum thing, like Twitter or all of internet tbh, got out of hand.
Are you noticing a pattern here
People made weird comments and Twitter made stupid decisions. It's dead
Reddit is freaking stranger danger, also dead
Wonder what's happening here
Twitter?? 🤯
No no no no, this is a chess website, oh noooo



Well said! #JusticeForHornet