OK YALL CHESS.COM GOT RID OF HORNETS TITLE CUZ THEY DONT LIKE HITLER CASE CLOSED GOODBYE
This Is Wrong Chess.com
Sort:
martin stahl moment
Jul 6, 2023
0
#85
So here is my argument to the situation.
I read the blog multiple times, even before it was removed. It only tells you about Hitler's chess ability, how the game between him vs Lenin was setup, the game, and if its real. He also said
Right there, he said that he did not support what he did. Also the thumbnail. I mean, what else he is going to put in there, the blog stated about Hitler, so why not put his face in there, whats the difference between making the blog on his game, and putting his face in the thumbnail?
And that it is offensive to Jews, again, this is not reference to his actions in any way, is just saying his name and his game enough to be offensive? Even a Jewish top blogger said he liked the post.
And that chess.com has a right to demote him, yes they do, but we are protesting against it, if he really should be demoted or not. He made high quality posts, and got a following, and actually puts the time into his blogs unlike a certain top blogger that I know... Even if he deleted it, is the damage done? Hornet, really took the time, it seems unfair that he did demoted, away from the top of the list where many people can see his blogs.
It is not a form of hate speech, or anything offensive, it is just chess. Overall, I think that @HornetCruise should be given his title back, and that demoting him is unjustified.
#JusticeForHornet
can i have top blogger then?
on a serious note though while i was not offended i found it funny that you would use one of the worlds worst icons who have caused massive trauma and heartbreak to millions of people even if it was just to show their chess game which changes nothing. this is kind of your fault but at the same time its also the fault of the staff member as while he said to avoid it he did say it wasn't breaking any rules but then took away your status so he also broke what he thought was right
Jul 6, 2023
0
#89
"writing this is not breaking any rules" -> pulls top blogger status
in what way was that fair
#JusticeForHornet
#JusticeForHornet, this is RIDICULOUS CHESS.COM!
Thanks,
KM400
#JusticeForHornet
8thMarch2023 wrote:
TheChessKnight2000 wrote:
So here is my argument to the situation.
I read the blog multiple times, even before it was removed. It only tells you about Hitler's chess ability, how the game between him vs Lenin was setup, the game, and if its real. He also said
Right there, he said that he did not support what he did. Also the thumbnail. I mean, what else he is going to put in there, the blog stated about Hitler, so why not put his face in there, whats the difference between making the blog on his game, and putting his face in the thumbnail?
And that it is offensive to Jews, again, this is not reference to his actions in any way, is just saying his name and his game enough to be offensive? Even a Jewish top blogger said he liked the post.
And that chess.com has a right to demote him, yes they do, but we are protesting against it, if he really should be demoted or not. He made high quality posts, and got a following, and actually puts the time into his blogs unlike a certain top blogger that I know... Even if he deleted it, is the damage done? Hornet, really took the time, it seems unfair that he did demoted, away from the top of the list where many people can see his blogs.
It is not a form of hate speech, or anything offensive, it is just chess. Overall, I think that @HornetCruise should be given his title back, and that demoting him is unjustified.
#JusticeForHornet
If I took a screenshot from the article, of Hitler, and selectively quoted the article could I come up with a misleading story of the contrary and make chess.com look bad?
Just like Trump is a racist, or Tate hates women, perhaps Hornet, through the presentation of an astute adversary was pro hitter, pro Bin Laden or pro Zelensky.
Was Chess.com covering their political booty?
That makes a bunch of sense, because posting a picture of someone means you agree with the horrible atrocities they committed.
Thanks,
KM400
Everybody should message Chess.com staff and demand that Hornet's Top Blogger status be returned. This is outrageous.
Thanks,
KM400
8thMarch2023 wrote:
KingMonkey400 wrote:
8thMarch2023 wrote:
TheChessKnight2000 wrote:
So here is my argument to the situation.
I read the blog multiple times, even before it was removed. It only tells you about Hitler's chess ability, how the game between him vs Lenin was setup, the game, and if its real. He also said
Right there, he said that he did not support what he did. Also the thumbnail. I mean, what else he is going to put in there, the blog stated about Hitler, so why not put his face in there, whats the difference between making the blog on his game, and putting his face in the thumbnail?
And that it is offensive to Jews, again, this is not reference to his actions in any way, is just saying his name and his game enough to be offensive? Even a Jewish top blogger said he liked the post.
And that chess.com has a right to demote him, yes they do, but we are protesting against it, if he really should be demoted or not. He made high quality posts, and got a following, and actually puts the time into his blogs unlike a certain top blogger that I know... Even if he deleted it, is the damage done? Hornet, really took the time, it seems unfair that he did demoted, away from the top of the list where many people can see his blogs.
It is not a form of hate speech, or anything offensive, it is just chess. Overall, I think that @HornetCruise should be given his title back, and that demoting him is unjustified.
#JusticeForHornet
If I took a screenshot from the article, of Hitler, and selectively quoted the article could I come up with a misleading story of the contrary and make chess.com look bad?
Just like Trump is a racist, or Tate hates women, perhaps Hornet, through the presentation of an astute adversary was pro hitter, pro Bin Laden or pro Zelensky.
Was Chess.com covering their political booty?
That makes a bunch of sense, because posting a picture of someone means you agree with the horrible atrocities they committed.
Thanks,
KM400
Judging by your flag you live in the united states.
You know people do this all the time to make their political opponents look worse?
Oh that person is a racist, oh that person hates law enforcement, or this religious group, or this sexuality or whatever else.
A picture here, an outlandish remark there.
Literally could snapshot Hornet's article, the picture and say they are romanticizing Hitler and that chesscom is a nazi platform or whatever other sensational cap.
A story like that might even do well on youtube or tiktok.
I was being sarcastic in my comment haha. Yes, I agree, it's stupid.
Thanks,
KM400
place your bets, people!
will chess.com mods/staff:
give some weird ahh response to this situation
lock or delete this thread
close hornet’s accoutn (real!!1!1!1)
give hornet tb back
8thMarch2023 wrote:
Shadow ban thread, mute accounts and lock it later
possible
but that would make cc look bad after the muting
i messaged the staff guy to see if he could look at my application cause eh too lazy
Kowarenai wrote:
i messaged the staff guy to see if he could look at my application cause eh too lazy
application for what
actual_knight_gaming wrote:
8thMarch2023 wrote:
Shadow ban thread, mute accounts and lock it later
possible
but that would make cc look bad after the muting
i mean bro they have the reason for muting it as ofc they dont want a blog about that guy even if its not intended for bad purposes like hornet said cause it doesnt matter, its still horrible
Staff has to read them all every month and decide.....which is the best? Do you see how this begins to get generalized? Best at what?......writing style?.......game analysis? The OP mentioned 1 little minor thing......HITLER! And just like that,....