titled players
Sort:
Very interesting, some of these. 
Some of them are not titled players.
dalmatinac wrote: Some of them are not titled players.
What do you consider as "titled" ? Only GMs ? Or perhaps only fide titles and not national titles ?
No,it was my mistake I thought on all players on chess.com which put that they are titled players.I didn't see at all Bill's list.
I'm pretty sure this Nigel Davies guy is a fraud. He is supposedly rated 2477, but he hasn't even won a game here.
It is not ok Mathijs,blame somebody without proofs.You know for many titled players online chess sites can be very attractive because of getting new pupils and earning money.
mathijs wrote: I'm pretty sure this Nigel Davies guy is a fraud. He is supposedly rated 2477, but he hasn't even won a game here.
How many games has he played here ? I dont see a game history for him at all.
mathijs wrote: I'm pretty sure this Nigel Davies guy is a fraud. He is supposedly rated 2477, but he hasn't even won a game here.
I think he's on the level. Perhaps he just doesn't like to play with us patzers. We might make him worse! 
mathijs wrote: I'm pretty sure this Nigel Davies guy is a fraud. He is supposedly rated 2477, but he hasn't even won a game here.
Kinda hard to win a game when he's never played one. But, I would say that he is at least very close if not winning in a game against the entire site, so, there is that.
What I wanted to say is that "titled" players on chess.com,which put only NM,FM,IM or GM without name and surname,picture.I think chess.com should simply delete them.
Remove from titled players.
dalmatinac wrote: What I wanted to say is that "titled" players on chess.com,which put only NM,FM,IM or GM without name and surname,picture.I think chess.com should simply delete them.
And who are you to decide chess.com policy where titled players are concerned? I believe titled players are required to provide "proof" to chess.com that they are titled. They arent required to prove anything to you nor to other members of chess.com.
You are arrogant reb.
Fight, fight!!!!!
dalmatinac wrote: You are arrogant reb.
How very "Christian" of you ! How am I the one who is arrogant when it is you that think you have something to do with chess.com policy? How am I the arrogant one when its you who feel titled players need to prove to you that they are titled?
Baseballfan wrote: mathijs wrote: I'm pretty sure this Nigel Davies guy is a fraud. He is supposedly rated 2477, but he hasn't even won a game here.
Kinda hard to win a game when he's never played one. But, I would say that he is at least very close if not winning in a game against the entire site, so, there is that.
Yes, Im pretty sure he is not a fraud. Though its strange how titled playes have a chess.com rating like 1150 or 1500, It could be a computer/otb thing I don't know.
dalmatinac wrote: You are arrogant reb.
How very "Christian" of you ! How am I the one who is arrogant when it is you that think you have something to do with chess.com policy? How am I the arrogant one when its you who feel titled players need to prove to you that they are titled?
I didn't say all titled players but some need.And is fault to be honest?
And this haven't nothing with religion,reb why you are so angry man?
Here is a list of all the titled players at www.chess.com
There are 38 players who say they are titled.
20 of them have never played a game at www.chess.com
Of the 18 who have, only 12 seem to be active.
Of the 12 active, titled players, only 6 are rated above 2200 here.