You need to put an s in your diagree.
Uses of the block feature
Sort:
#4- As a way of expressing a fit of pique.
#5 To justify you detention group
woodshover wrote:
You need to put an s in your diagree.
Thanks for the heads-up. But why are you posting in my topic, if I'm so disagreeable you had to block me?
#7 Intimidating "trolls" and such
.
#9 because you don't know that chesskid was made for kids who can't tolerate the slightest bit of criticism
Wow, we've managed to draw in blocking royalty to elucidate his reasons! Now, if only we could have Neff and Windows join in, we'd really understand the blocker's soul...
I am considering blocking someone just to see if #8 is true. Do you get a rush or what is meant by "to have fun?"
#10 you didn't understand someone's post, which automatically means it is an insult
Sep 25, 2010
0
#13
theoreticalboy wrote:
Wow, we've managed to draw in blocking royalty to elucidate his reasons! Now, if only we could have Neff and Windows join in, we'd really understand the blocker's soul...
David_Neff was the most sensitive soul to ever grace the forums...IN INTERNET HISTORY! I miss him...
"flame war" read: "discussion with more than one point of view"
trysts wrote:
theoreticalboy wrote:
Wow, we've managed to draw in blocking royalty to elucidate his reasons! Now, if only we could have Neff and Windows join in, we'd really understand the blocker's soul...
David_Neff was the most sensitive soul to ever grace the forums...IN INTERNET HISTORY! I miss him...
Did you lose track of him?
Sep 25, 2010
0
#17
RDR75 wrote:
trysts wrote:
theoreticalboy wrote:
Wow, we've managed to draw in blocking royalty to elucidate his reasons! Now, if only we could have Neff and Windows join in, we'd really understand the blocker's soul...
David_Neff was the most sensitive soul to ever grace the forums...IN INTERNET HISTORY! I miss him...
Did you lose track of him?
I thought the collar was secure, but yes, I lost track of him, RDR75
Karl_ wrote:
You don't see me blocking anyone who just disagrees with what I say.
Yes, I do.
Touché
Karl_ wrote:
ivandh wrote:
"flame war" read: "discussion with more than one point of view"
Not most people's definition of it. Discussions usually have more than one point of view. You don't see me blocking anyone who just disagrees with what I say. Just if they tend to attack me personally. Or try to hijack any of my topics. There is a difference.
Which one applies to my blocking, and which to TheGrobe's, then?
I thought we should catalogue them!
#1 - avoid answering reasonable questions
#2 - convince yourself that you're important and your topics matter
#3 - devolve entire forums into more manageable cliques of people who never disagree with you.
What else, then?