weak bots for women’s history month
Sort:
Why are the bots for women’s history month so weak? I mean, I shouldn’t be able to beat the person who invented the principle behind wifi or the person who invented computer programming. (I’m not that good.)
Malala plays the Borg 1...g5
Mar 4, 2023
0
#3
I think it is outrages that chess.com pretends to honour women, while they are obviously convinced that women should have lower ratings than the usual bots! I ask chess.com to change this immediately!
Doesn't Malala live in England why has she got the international flag.
Mar 4, 2023
0
#5
It was a choice between picking bots for notable women who were weak chess players, or for strong woman chess players who were not historically notable.
psychohist wrote:
It was a choice between picking bots for notable women who were weak chess players, or for strong woman chess players who were not historically notable.
It's not like necromancy into AI form is involved. Chess.com have control over setting who the bots are named after and what elo they are given.
Just hear me out here… they’re bots who cares. Plus you need a range of ratings that new players can play against.
