What the newbees should know about Chess.com.
Sort:
Sep 6, 2011
0
#42
the opposite of newbee would be oldbee. but the term is n00b so i'm not sure it matters much.
ilikeflags wrote:
the opposite of newbee would be oldbee. but the term is n00b so i'm not sure it matters much.
n00b has the negative vibe associated with it?
play with a beer or five , or a vodka, lose but funnnny
An oldie, ilikeflags, is someone who has been on this site longer than the newbies, and some of them, like you, think that they own the site and have more rights then the newbies, which is false.
Sep 7, 2011
0
#46
checkmateibeatu wrote:
An oldie, ilikeflags, is someone who has been on this site longer than the newbies, and some of them, like you, think that they own the site and have more rights then the newbies, which is false.
oinquarki wrote:
beater - Quit hijacking threads with your personal gripes.
Newbies aren't always beginners and members who have been around the block a couple times aren't always experts, so that might not work.
According to whomever is doing the labelling, how long until you stop being a noob?
ivandh wrote:
Waffles are better than pancakes.
Heck yeah!
Sep 7, 2011
0
#49
winerkleiner wrote:
ilikeflags wrote:
the opposite of newbee would be oldbee. but the term is n00b so i'm not sure it matters much.
n00b has the negative vibe associated with it?
dont tell ilikeflags he is negative its bad karma
ilikeflags wrote:
what are oldies?
50s crooner tunes?
trysts wrote:
BluegrassPrincess wrote:
What should we love about chess.com? I have a split feeling about this site... I want to like it more than dislike it...........
Just watch out for the "Chess.com mafia"! Apparently they run the joint
They'll snap the hat off your bishops if you mess with them.
checkmateibeatu wrote:
And apparently, I don't have the right to block those people, but they are free to say whatever they want about me not having the right to make threads just because I'm new, and say that I am someone's second account, and that I have to accept Lenny Bongcloud votes, qll of which are not true!
Uhhh didn't you already exercise your right to block people multiple times already? Surely anybody here has the right to criticise your choice to do so?
Sep 7, 2011
0
#53
You should know about the Greek Gift Sacrifice http://www.chess.com/forum/view/game-showcase/my-first-greek-gift
I have the right to block up to 200 people, you have the right to block up to 200 people. I have the right to post, you have the right to post. There is no rule in chess.com which says that rights vary depending on how long you've been on this site.
theoreticalboy wrote:
checkmateibeatu wrote:
And apparently, I don't have the right to block those people, but they are free to say whatever they want about me not having the right to make threads just because I'm new, and say that I am someone's second account, and that I have to accept Lenny Bongcloud votes, qll of which are not true!
Uhhh didn't you already exercise your right to block people multiple times already? Surely anybody here has the right to criticise your choice to do so?
Criticise it all you want, you're still blocked.
mrguy888 wrote:
checkmateibeatu wrote:
Oh, so you just expect me to lay down and do nothing? When you want something done, do it! Basically, what you are asking me to do is just lay down and let you people just continue runing over me. Ain't gonna happen.
Yes. It was your fault after all.
That is a very bad assumption...
checkmateibeatu wrote:
mrguy888 wrote:
checkmateibeatu wrote:
Oh, so you just expect me to lay down and do nothing? When you want something done, do it! Basically, what you are asking me to do is just lay down and let you people just continue runing over me. Ain't gonna happen.
Yes. It was your fault after all.
That is a very bad assumption...
It isn't an assumption. I read the threads.
mrguy888 wrote:
checkmateibeatu wrote:
mrguy888 wrote:
checkmateibeatu wrote:
Oh, so you just expect me to lay down and do nothing? When you want something done, do it! Basically, what you are asking me to do is just lay down and let you people just continue runing over me. Ain't gonna happen.
Yes. It was your fault after all.
That is a very bad assumption...
It isn't an assumption. I read the threads.
Then you must read them wrong, because I am not the kind of person who lays down and does nothing (I used to be about a month and a half ago, but not anymore).
checkmateibeatu wrote:
I have the right to block up to 200 people, you have the right to block up to 200 people. I have the right to post, you have the right to post. There is no rule in chess.com which says that rights vary depending on how long you've been on this site.
I don't know that I've ever seen anyone claim that there was.
TheGrobe wrote:
checkmateibeatu wrote:
I have the right to block up to 200 people, you have the right to block up to 200 people. I have the right to post, you have the right to post. There is no rule in chess.com which says that rights vary depending on how long you've been on this site.
I don't know that I've ever seen anyone claim that there was.
But you people were definitely acting like it, because you were telling me to stop making threads, as if you people were my bosses.
For someone so vehemently and vocally opposed to thread-jacking, you sure hijacked this one.