The more rating you have the more difficult it is to find games on longer time controls
Why almost nobody plays 5+2 Time control in Chess.com
I think it's just established like that. +5 increment is a bit too much for a 5 min game. If more people plays 5+2 then it can shift towards to it. Since nobody finds 5+2 game so no choice for them.
@DrPhenomenale
I'm going to tell you a "back in the days" stories.
Back in the days when I played chess in a real chess club, time control was
90 minutes for 40 moves + 60 minutes.
Ponder that.
@DrPhenomenale The increment pool has a concentration of cheaters, for example people who like to consult the Lichess database in the middle of games. This is a shame for all of us who enjoy increment and don't particularly like all the premove stuff.
5|3 is the standard time control for the Classical World Championship blitz tie breakers.
3|2 is the standard time control for the Blitz World Championship.
I can't find/play any games on 5+2 or 5+3 session here. 3+0 and 3+2 are too short for me. Either playing 5+0 or 5+5. I'm tired of losing only because of time when i'm completely winning(5+0). Some little increment would be great like +2,+3. I like rapid(10+0,10+5) but it takes much time and not good for regular play.
Correct.
I don't like increments.
Neither do I but maybe I'm going to start playing them because I'm slowing down.
i wish 10+0 would be 10+2 instead. nothing worse than having a winning position with little time and losing because you just can't move with your mouse quick enough to win the game.
I can't find/play any games on 5+2 or 5+3 session here. 3+0 and 3+2 are too short for me. Either playing 5+0 or 5+5. I'm tired of losing only because of time when i'm completely winning(5+0). Some little increment would be great like +2,+3. I like rapid(10+0,10+5) but it takes much time and not good for regular play.