Why Hikaru Nakamura doesn't participate in US Championship?

Sort:
Avatar of rumpelstiltskin04

Fred and the goats...wrapped up in barbed wire

Avatar of pfren
ChesswithNickolay wrote:

Yes, but how does that have anything to do with my statement? I never stated I was almost as good as an IM, though I have a feeling you spent 30 years of your life for that IM title.

 

Well, you may consider doing the same, after getting a life first.

Avatar of PerpetualPatzer123
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
pfren wrote:
brianchesscake wrote:

He's scared of losing rating points, as the US Championship has lots of relatively lower rated contestants, and even if Hikaru draws one of them he will lose rating.

Basically he wants to preserve his high rating by continuing to draw other elite players in their super-GM "bubble" and doesn't want to risk dropping out of the top 10.

 

Dropping out of top ten? This has happened ages ago- he is currently #19.

Super-GM bubble? OK, I get your point- who am I to dispute Jesus who said ignorance is bliss?

Who knew an IM can be this dumb? He wants to be in the top 10 US you fool!

Shut up.

Avatar of PerpetualPatzer123
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
pfren wrote:
ChesswithNickolay wrote:

Yes, but how does that have anything to do with my statement? I never stated I was almost as good as an IM, though I have a feeling you spent 30 years of your life for that IM title.

 

Well, you may consider doing the same, after getting a life first.

 

 

 

I do have a life, I am not sure you do. Like dude, why would you dedicate 30 years to get an IM title? That's like giving away half of your life for not even the greatest title!

Someone like you wouldn't understand what enjoyment/passion is.

Avatar of PerpetualPatzer123
ChesswithNickolay wrote:

I do, chess is my passion, but why would you spend 30 years of your life on something to become a poor IM? 

You said you’d choose video games over chess. I think you do not know what “passion” means.

Avatar of rumpelstiltskin04

Fischer was a chomo

central insanity agency

Some type of human engineering at Jewish in Louisville.   medical devices were billions of dollars years and years ago.

Gloria Vanderbilt was surrogate for her son's baby.

Avatar of rumpelstiltskin04

Fischer was sick.  Smyslov was sicker

Avatar of PerpetualPatzer123
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
AunTheKnight wrote:
ChesswithNickolay wrote:

I do, chess is my passion, but why would you spend 30 years of your life on something to become a poor IM? 

You said you’d choose video games over chess. I think you do not know what “passion” means.

lol, I don't choose it over chess, but if I had to pick one to be my career option, definitely video games cause they earn much more, are a bit more fun than chess, you can socialize with others more than in chess, you can make content successfully, and more. I know what passion means, and both are my passions. I wish to excel at both preferably, but depending on the circumstances, I may choose one or the other.

It’s not passion if you choose money over it. 

Avatar of DreamscapeHorizons
rumpelstiltskin04 wrote:

Fischer was a chomo

central insanity agency

Some type of human engineering at Jewish in Louisville.   medical devices were billions of dollars years and years ago.

Gloria Vanderbilt was surrogate for her son's baby.

 

Wait....  what?   

Avatar of rumpelstiltskin04

No. What?

Avatar of PerpetualPatzer123
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
AunTheKnight wrote:
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
AunTheKnight wrote:
ChesswithNickolay wrote:

I do, chess is my passion, but why would you spend 30 years of your life on something to become a poor IM? 

You said you’d choose video games over chess. I think you do not know what “passion” means.

lol, I don't choose it over chess, but if I had to pick one to be my career option, definitely video games cause they earn much more, are a bit more fun than chess, you can socialize with others more than in chess, you can make content successfully, and more. I know what passion means, and both are my passions. I wish to excel at both preferably, but depending on the circumstances, I may choose one or the other.

It’s not passion if you choose money over it. 

So if you like doing something, you shouldn't try to earn money from it. Thanks.

No. If you truly love something, you will do it no matter how much money you earn. Don't you say you have an A in English? More proof North American schools are broken.

Avatar of rumpelstiltskin04

Corruption in the courts

One was shot in the stomach

One was shot in the chest cavity

Lopp had an ex parte conversation

Like i said ----> corruption in the courts

Avatar of Immaculate_Slayer
ChesswithNickolay escreveu:

I do, chess is my passion, but why would you spend 30 years of your life on something to become a poor IM? 

Who cares about what title you get?

It's not about how you are recognized by a group of people in suits with an unfair rating system, it's about what you learn and experience in the process of becoming a good chess player. That's why people don't quit chess just because they aren't the greatest chess player that has ever lived.

Avatar of PerpetualPatzer123
ChesswithNickolay wrote:

You should quit it if after 10 years you are flat or barely 1800.

If one truly loves the game, they won’t.

Avatar of SpacePodz
Well I’ve been playing for a year, and I’m still at 700. I doubt I’ll ever be even over 1000, but I love the game so I keep playing. I don’t think you should stop playing just because you aren’t improving. If you are having fun, that is all that matters.
Avatar of PerpetualPatzer123
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
AunTheKnight wrote:
ChesswithNickolay wrote:

You should quit it if after 10 years you are flat or barely 1800.

If one truly loves the game, they won’t.

If they play for fun. then sure, 100%

Why would you not play something for fun?

Avatar of Immaculate_Slayer
AunTheKnight escreveu:
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
AunTheKnight wrote:
ChesswithNickolay wrote:

You should quit it if after 10 years you are flat or barely 1800.

If one truly loves the game, they won’t.

If they play for fun. then sure, 100%

Why would you not play something for fun?

Didn't Mikhail Tal play chess for fun?

Avatar of PerpetualPatzer123
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
AunTheKnight wrote:
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
AunTheKnight wrote:
ChesswithNickolay wrote:

You should quit it if after 10 years you are flat or barely 1800.

If one truly loves the game, they won’t.

If they play for fun. then sure, 100%

Why would you not play something for fun?

You can play it to be top at it, attain a title, start a chess career, become a chess coach, and many more. Sure, it is still fun, just not 100%.

If chess weren’t fun to the top GMs, they wouldn’t be GMs. Getting a title is simply an achievement for your dedication and skill. 

Avatar of EuphoniousJones

 

Playing covid chess is just so unacceptable.

Avatar of PerpetualPatzer123
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
AunTheKnight wrote:
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
AunTheKnight wrote:
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
AunTheKnight wrote:
ChesswithNickolay wrote:

You should quit it if after 10 years you are flat or barely 1800.

If one truly loves the game, they won’t.

If they play for fun. then sure, 100%

Why would you not play something for fun?

You can play it to be top at it, attain a title, start a chess career, become a chess coach, and many more. Sure, it is still fun, just not 100%.

If chess weren’t fun to the top GMs, they wouldn’t be GMs. Getting a title is simply an achievement for your dedication and skill. 

Did I say it wasn't fun? No I said it wasn't 100% fun. 

Why wouldn’t chess be 100% fun?