Except for the even bigger tournament that starts in 12 days. There's that.
Why Hikaru Nakamura doesn't participate in US Championship?

You should quit it if after 10 years you are flat or barely 1800.
If one truly loves the game, they won’t.
If they play for fun. then sure, 100%
Why would you not play something for fun?
You can play it to be top at it, attain a title, start a chess career, become a chess coach, and many more. Sure, it is still fun, just not 100%.
If chess weren’t fun to the top GMs, they wouldn’t be GMs. Getting a title is simply an achievement for your dedication and skill.
Did I say it wasn't fun? No I said it wasn't 100% fun.
Why wouldn’t chess be 100% fun?
For me, I can play for fun completely, not caring about my loses and wins, playing horrible but fun openings, sacrificing material for fun, and setting up positions that are fun.
Lol, I think we mean two different things.
I am saying if it fully fun, don’t play it.
I think you are saying something else…
Why should you not play it when it is 100% fun?
If something isn’t fun, don’t do it.

Yes, but how does that have anything to do with my statement?
Aren't you the dumb guy of the story?
Nah, you made a dumb statement even though you are superior to me in chess.
Where are your parents? Why do they allow you to be the whole day on internet? Do they know how disrespectful you are?

i always found this to be a bizarre position. You waste countless hours to become one of the best players in the world in an activity that no one in their right mind would do for monetary gain, but you suddenly find making a few more bucks streaming more personally enjoyable than what you worked for your whole life? Naka is as loaded as any chess player can realistically hope to be.
I find the Carlsen trauma explanation more believable. XD. Kasparov left for politics, but at least that at least resembles a calling more.
You make a good point.
Though, I'm not convinced that Nakamura is traumatized by Carlsen. A lot of players think Hikaru is scared of Magnus, but I don't think that's true at all.
I think, mostly, Nakamura is frustrated. In post-game interviews, he rarely attributes Carlsen's victories to Carlsen - Nakamura almost always blames himself.
He usually feels that he gets decent positions, then gets careless and lets the game slide away.
It's never "Carlsen outplayed me". It's almost always, "I was doing good, then I screwed it up. If I'd just played this, or this, my position would've been fine ..."
I agree. I think he had the dream of being the World Champion one day. Now, he is frustrated and has lost interest in the game.
On the other hand, nobody wonders why Carlsen doesn´t participate in the Norwegian national championship, or Grischuk in the Russian one, being played nowadays.

You should quit it if after 10 years you are flat or barely 1800.
If one truly loves the game, they won’t.
If they play for fun. then sure, 100%
Why would you not play something for fun?
You can play it to be top at it, attain a title, start a chess career, become a chess coach, and many more. Sure, it is still fun, just not 100%.
If chess weren’t fun to the top GMs, they wouldn’t be GMs. Getting a title is simply an achievement for your dedication and skill.
Did I say it wasn't fun? No I said it wasn't 100% fun.
Why wouldn’t chess be 100% fun?
For me, I can play for fun completely, not caring about my loses and wins, playing horrible but fun openings, sacrificing material for fun, and setting up positions that are fun.
Lol, I think we mean two different things.
I am saying if it fully fun, don’t play it.
I think you are saying something else…
Why should you not play it when it is 100% fun?
If something isn’t fun, don’t do it.
Did I say chess is not fun at all? NO!
Chess is fun, but you have the power to decide whether you will have 70% of that fun, or 100% of that fun.
Why wouldn’t you have 100% fun? Makes no sense…

You should quit it if after 10 years you are flat or barely 1800.
If one truly loves the game, they won’t.
If they play for fun. then sure, 100%
Why would you not play something for fun?
You can play it to be top at it, attain a title, start a chess career, become a chess coach, and many more. Sure, it is still fun, just not 100%.
If chess weren’t fun to the top GMs, they wouldn’t be GMs. Getting a title is simply an achievement for your dedication and skill.
Did I say it wasn't fun? No I said it wasn't 100% fun.
Why wouldn’t chess be 100% fun?
For me, I can play for fun completely, not caring about my loses and wins, playing horrible but fun openings, sacrificing material for fun, and setting up positions that are fun.
Lol, I think we mean two different things.
I am saying if it fully fun, don’t play it.
I think you are saying something else…
Why should you not play it when it is 100% fun?
If something isn’t fun, don’t do it.
Did I say chess is not fun at all? NO!
Chess is fun, but you have the power to decide whether you will have 70% of that fun, or 100% of that fun.
Why wouldn’t you have 100% fun? Makes no sense…
The IQ...
I think being able to analyze both sides of an argument and to see something from another's perspective is a super power, many fail to do this.
Wait!
I mean that if you don't have fun, don't do it.
You are talking about playing seriously. I agree with you if that's the case.

Lol, I didn't expect it to be such a stormy discourse, haha.
Well, I thought the National Championships are esteemed more by the players than some high-priced competitions, since in my eyes, a prestige of ie. being most titled champion in nation's history outweighs any kind of income. But I'm not even a pro!
However perhaps the prestige of the large international tournaments is even greater than of a national championship.

I'd say the international events r more prestigious. Especially this one starting on October 27, the top 2 finishers qualify for the next candidates tournament. Nakamura is in it along with Aronian, Caruana, etc. Basically almost all the biggest names in chess.

Lol, I didn't expect it to be such a stormy discourse, haha.
Well, I thought the National Championships are esteemed more by the players than some high-priced competitions, since in my eyes, a prestige of ie. being most titled champion in nation's history outweighs any kind of income. But I'm not even a pro!
However perhaps the prestige of the large international tournaments is even greater than of a national championship.
Over the past 16 years, Hikaru Nakamura has won the U.S. Chess Championship more than any other player (five times).
He has already proven himself in that regard.
The FIDE Grand Swiss is simply a different whale to chase. It also has a $425,000 prize fund, compared to the US CC's prize fund of $194,000 ... so that might also have something to do with it ...

the guiy probabbly got better, and more important things on his agenda to addend to, simpley as that


Yes, but how does that have anything to do with my statement?
Aren't you the dumb guy of the story?
lol

Lol, I didn't expect it to be such a stormy discourse, haha.
Well, I thought the National Championships are esteemed more by the players than some high-priced competitions, since in my eyes, a prestige of ie. being most titled champion in nation's history outweighs any kind of income. But I'm not even a pro!
However perhaps the prestige of the large international tournaments is even greater than of a national championship.
national titles are meaningless to world class players. Some do take a sort of small pride in being the person to have won their national championship most times in history but its a small item in their bucket list. (it also depends heavily on country, some FIDE masters have the record for most national titles won in their country, in a post-soviet country, thats no easy feat at all).
really prestige means really little in chess, aside from the WC, WJC and handful of other events. The game is too meritocratic and rating does already enough justice to need them. After all, one bad week of perfomance does not make the winner of an event a better player than you per se.
when i was a talented scholastic player in FL often wondered why our top junior players in the rankings, a certain fabiano caruana rated 2400 didnt bother to show up to our junior state championships. In hindsight the answer is pretty obvious, the event wasnt worth the dirt on his shoe even then. Heck , only our legit state championship in the last round or two would have been deemed a worthy warm up (and considering i have reached as high as third in such events, may be not even that lol)

That comment about national championships being meaningless if ur a world class player makes a lot of sense. It's like not caring about a stste championship if ur one of the best nationally. Or not caring about being the best on ur street of ur trying to win a state title.
Naka needs to focus on getting his azz back in the candidates.

Naka probably more worried about getten paid and getten leaiyed. Now that he is a big shot in the world its all about the bling bling dolla dolla yo. $$$
He don't got nothin more to prove by winin some crumby tournament. Everyone know he good at chess game. If anything, its a classy move for him to not show up, let the little guiys have their moment in the sun
Hikaru said he isnt taking chess as a proffesion anymore,he rather streams