RonaldJosephCote wrote:
I see an upside down bunny rabbit
Why was this thread locked?
Sort:
RonaldJosephCote wrote:
I see rage against existential ennui pressing outward against socially-conditioned complacency, ripping a human spirit apart in the process.
macer75 wrote:
So... it looks like Baldman was just banned or muted. I wonder what happened.
HIs trail of misogynystic vitriol finally caught up to him.
What's chess?
LadyMisil wrote:
What's chess?
Chess is an excuse for guys to sit in front of a woman for hours and stare at their cleavage and not feel pervy about it.
Oh! Thanks, cheeky chick. I thought we were playing inkblots. My bad.
Sorry, power2thePeople. I don't remember 2-3 years ago. But I am the only LadyMisil. If it was me, thank you for the compliment. And by the way, I'm not an expert on anything, too.
I sure do. I live next door to one. Oh, wait. It's just a hotel called the Pagoda ...
OnceUponaCheckmate wrote:
But at least you should know what pagoda is.
Pagoda sounds like an African American twist on the name Yoda
Yoda= Pagoda
Luke =Lukuisha
Ob1canobe= Ob1Kaneesha
C3PO= CtrayP OG
Sep 5, 2016
0
#71
Let's not deviate from the original topic guys, the mod who locked the thread needs to be brought to justice.
nimzomalaysian wrote:
Let's not deviate from the original topic guys, the mod who locked the thread needs to be brought to justice.
Well if you wanna know the truth about the original thread that was locked? Here it is in Plain Chess.com English: The thread employed what is termed as toilet humor. Which is in fact against Chess.coms Terms of service. We should all [that posted in that thread] be grateful that we were not muted or had our accounts suspended. 
Sep 5, 2016
0
#73
cheeky_chicky wrote:
nimzomalaysian wrote:
Let's not deviate from the original topic guys, the mod who locked the thread needs to be brought to justice.
Well if you wanna know the truth about the original thread that was locked? Here it is in Plan Chess.com English: The thread employed what is termed as toilet humor. Which is in fact against Chess.coms Terms of service. We should all [that posted in that thread] be grateful that we were not muted or had our accounts suspended.
Whut??? All it proves is that the mod has a very dirty mind. What do you see here?
[Removed image from the Dirty Mind test - even if it's not actually of what it looks like at first glance, what it DOES look like at first glance matters. David]
I started laughing so hard after I read the fifth comment of that thread that I couldn't go on any longer XD XD XD XD XD
nimzomalaysian wrote:
Let's not deviate from the original topic guys, the mod who locked the thread needs to be brought to justice.
g morning o little one. I must apologise. I just read the thread u mentioned. It was getting a bit hot!!
My only answer on that thread is that I do it with 2 hands. I lay it on the palm of the left hand and stroke the top with my right hand.
Tactics are just great on the phone. .... I have a Samsung 
" the mod who locked the thread needs to be brought to justice". What kind of justice did you have in mind?
Sep 5, 2016
0
#78
RonaldJosephCote wrote:
" the mod who locked the thread needs to be brought to justice". What kind of justice did you have in mind?
Letting others know the mod's name should be enough I think.
RonaldJosephCote wrote:
" the mod who locked the thread needs to be brought to justice". What kind of justice did you have in mind?
We're all DOOMED I tell ya.
Wellington as military commander was undoubtedly a hands-on micromanager, trusting his subordinates as little as possible, and showing many of the characteristics of the modern day control freak.[13] In 1811 he wrote that “I am obliged to be everywhere and if absent from any operation, something goes wrong … success can only be attained by attention to the most minute details”.[14]
By contrast, Napoleon gave his marshals much more tactical freedom.[15] At the critical meeting of the two generals at the Battle of Waterloo — where Wellington's close supervision contrasted strongly with the effective delegation of operational management by Napoleon to Marshall Ney[16] — it was at least arguably Wellington's control mania that played the decisive role in the Allied victory, justifying his claim the following day that “I don't think it would have been done if I had not been there”.[17]
Queen Victoria[edit]A series of three documentary programs on BBC2 in the UK in January 2013 called Queen Victoria's Children argued that Queen Victoria was a pathological control freak by the way she controlled the welfare of all her children.[18]
Steve Jobs and closed systems[edit]Steve Jobs was a perfectionist who favored the closed system of control over all aspects of a product from start to finish — what he termed the integrated over the fragmented approach.[19] As Steve Wozniak, his long-term collaborator and occasional critic, put it: "Apple gets you into their playpen and keeps you there".[20] The triumph of the Windows PC over the Mac was a blow for that philosophy, a situation that was then reversed by the successes of the iPod, iPhone, and iPad – only for the Android challenge to reopen the debate.[21]
Well they're all dead though so look how far it got them