2 rooks and a queen.
Sort:
roberthespartan
8 days ago
0
#21
2 rooks(as a low ELO person) In my opinion is better than a queen as it allows you to organise easy ladder checkmates in the endgame. though in mid game when you still have most of your peices rooks are basically useless while queens can offer checkmates early on.
7 days ago
0
#22
Queen, she can fork the 2 rooks using diagonals, and since she can move in all direction it's just dumbfounded. Don't know why people even ramble about this [removed -- MS] online.
2 rooks are better
7 days ago
0
#24
Usually 2 rooks when the side with 2 rooks has a safe king (not exposed to any checks, if any then non-threatening ones) and coordinated rooks. But if the king is exposed then its more complicated (not that it wasnt complicated in the first place.)
In the situation when you have an exposed king and 2 rooks my advice is too keep your rooks together and protect your pawns. Also protect your king! Try not to get any other of the enemy pieces attacking you. Remember the queen itself cannot mate you! I think the best strategy is to create a passed pawn for the win. Plus, keep an extra eye out for forks.
also I am not responsible for any unwanted incidents.
7 days ago
0
#25
Ilampozhil25 wrote:
advanced people?
what sort of discrimination is this?
how are some people "more advanced" than others?
anyway, i would like to say that two rooks mate is marginally easier than queen mate and does not require a king, for what thats worth
It ain't discrimination buddy. It is just that sapne people are very good at chess, said people are called advanced.