I've always heard it as 10,000 hours to mastery. This number would probably be more relevant to chess as a whole, though.
I started with basic endgame checkmates: rook, queen, two rooks, two bishops. I don't know B+N+K vs K checkmates but that's because it happens so rarely at my level. Pawn endgames seem more important to study for me at this point.
I'm not sure about any of those books. I think just picking a sub-topic, like pawn endgames, and going through that, will help your endgame a lot. There will still be situations where you don't have endgame knowledge to help you, but more knowledge can't hurt.
I particularly enjoyed reading about the Q vs R endgame. I see it as more of a puzzle to be solved than an actual endgame to be memorized. It's such a fascinating setup, and even more fascinating is the fact that the queen can force checkmate even with a rook on the board. There are several starting positions that affect the strategy of forcing the K+R into what's known as a Philidor position.
Fun stuff!
It's said that it takes three weeks to master a skill. So I was thinking of this study plan: dedicate three weeks to one endgame type, start off studying from a one volume guide like FCE then move onto a specialized text like Secrets of Pawn Endings, then leave the minor piece section alone until the next three week block. Then after theoretical queen endings (very few books on these so I'm afraid I'll have to move from the queen section in FCE and BCE to the Queen volume of Comprehensive Chess Endings) I'd move onto strategic chess endings.
I already did a block of Endgame Strategy by Shereshevsky (though reviewing it won't hurt) and am wondering if Secrets of Endgame Strategy and How to Play Chess Endings is a good progression or if these books don't add anything meaningful on the topic. If I already read Endgame Strategy would those others be redundant?
Then after a few months move back to pawn endings but this time doing some basic refreshers then moving onto more advanced text such as Dvoretsky's Endgame Manual and Comprehensive Chess Endings.
I just want to know if I'm on the right track. I already did a week of The Survival Guide to Rook Endings and will move onto the rook section of Dvoretsky's Endgame Manual if I complete Survival Guide before the three weeks to stay consistent.
I know I should study middlegame themes such as planning too so I'll fit those into three week blocks as well in between endgame blocks. This is on top of 15 minutes of tactics a day for a warm up.