Zug wrote:
Wow! Thanks for the technique lesson.
i agree
K+P+P vs. K
Sort:
Are you serious???? Are you saying that to win you need to play correctly???? I am so shocked... Please share more of your wisdom!
just get your king in front of your pawns just the same if you had one pawn but much easier
I'm sorry guys! There'll be more!
I think I speak for Chess.com when I say, "Please, No more! I'm begging You!"
Krish30 wrote:
just get your king in front of your pawns just the same if you had one pawn but much easier
My technique is what to do if your king was far away!
[COMMENT DELETED]
You guys be nice! 
It's certainty useful to someone and gets extra points for not being posted in the GCD board.
mattattack99 wrote:
I think I speak for Chess.com when I say, "Please, No more! I'm begging You!"
I second that motion.
I liked the technique but I don't know why people hate it
Aug 28, 2009
0
#13
i learnt something, im 2200 rated here on chess.com, with a Tactics trainers rating of 2544
Aug 28, 2009
0
#14
Moving the king over essentially always works as well, no matter how far away it is (unless of course, your opponent has the chance to take a pawn to move into K+P v K which is very very very rare). These kinds of endgames have LOTS of ways to win.
You should also note that the pawns cannot support each other with exactly two files between them.
The trickiest K+2 v K situations are those in which a) the pawns are doubled (some cases here it's even a draw!) or the situations where the weaker side has some stalemating tricks in and around the corner.
Aug 29, 2009
0
#15
blagy wrote:
Endgames where one side has a king and two pawns against a lone king are almost always wins--if you play the pawns correctly. This is the technique.
This was the COMPLETE original post, which is why some of the early responders were ridiculing it. It has since been edited to add much more value.
Spiffe wrote:
blagy wrote:
Endgames where one side has a king and two pawns against a lone king are almost always wins--if you play the pawns correctly. This is the technique.
This was the COMPLETE original post, which is why some of the early responders were ridiculing it. It has since been edited to add much more value.
Ah! - everything makes much more sense now.
Redvii wrote:
Spiffe wrote:
blagy wrote:
Endgames where one side has a king and two pawns against a lone king are almost always wins--if you play the pawns correctly. This is the technique.
This was the COMPLETE original post, which is why some of the early responders were ridiculing it. It has since been edited to add much more value.
Ah! - everything makes much more sense now.
See? I'm not Crazy.
Endgames where one side has a king and two pawns against a lone king are almost always wins--if you play the pawns correctly. This is the technique.