12535 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I was reading Herman Grooten's "Chess Strategy for Club Players" here the other day, a book I would highly recommend. I came across an endgame between Kotov and Najdorf, and I just have to share this one with you, as I laughed my panties off reading it. Post a picture afterwards! I'll use Mr. Grooten's words from here on.
Here the Argentinian sacrificed both his rooks for both white pawns, in order to reach the notorious two knights ending:
1...Rxf4+ 2. Kxf4 Txg7 3.Nhg7+
Still relishing his own witticism, Najdorf got a suprise when his opponent played on. Flabbergasted, the Argentinian asked why his opponent wanted to continue in this "theoretically drawn position". "But didn't you know that someone in Tbilisi has finally found how this extremely difficult endgame can be won?", the Russian replied with a deadpan expression. When the blood had drained from Najdorf's face, Kotov laughed and offered a draw in his turn. This episode is described in Tim Krabbe's book New Chess Curiosities.
=) owned, great joke! (is there any more u can post?)
you have a whole game here(I have set a position several moves before the end):
Try to win it yourself.
Two Rooks will generally win against two Knights. Unfortunately, there's no way for White to get rid of the pawns without giving up at least one of the Rooks.
This position is clearly a draw. Black has no way to stop the pawns w/o losing material, white has no way to promote the pawns, and 2 knights are not enough to force checkmate w/o any other material on the board.
7/25/2016 - What Must Be Done
by BryanCFB a few minutes ago
What's the difference between a Super GM and a GM?
by pestebalcanica a few minutes ago
100 awkward moments in a game of chess
by egoole a few minutes ago
Post Your Current Playing Setup
by Eyechess 9 minutes ago
Unwittingly let too much time elapse! I lost UNFAIR 🤓🤓
by macer75 15 minutes ago
by jimbosley 21 minutes ago
What % of time to devote to play vs study as a beginner?
by Kartigan 26 minutes ago
When Should You Open the Center?
by Dale 45 minutes ago
how do I find daily players
by david 69 minutes ago
Reproduction and Real Jaques of London Chess Set
by loubalch 71 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!