Are mistakes as "bad" as blunders?

Sort:
Glad_Hander

EDIT: Before reading, please know that I mistyped the title of this thread. The title is supposed to read "Are misses as 'bad' as blunders?". I apologize for the confusion.

Generally, most of my games end with around half a dozen mistakes and/or blunders counted in the quick analysis, regardless of winning or losing. However, when I enter the in-depth game review, it turns out that most of these "blunders" weren't hung pieces or permitted attacks but instead missed attacks. Some of these are simple one-move takes I easily notice in retrospect, while others are multiple move sequences I never would have expected from low-level play.

My question here is: Should I worry about finding these moves? When I try to find complex tactics, I usually end up failing the attack due to unforeseen circumstances and losing material. I try to follow the advice of eliminating blunders as my first step to improve. But it feels like I'm going nowhere when the engine acts as if I hung a piece when I play it safe rather than following a specific ten move chain to win a single pawn. Your feedback is appreciated.

Martin_Stahl
Glad_Hander wrote:

EDIT: Before reading, please know that I mistyped the title of this thread. The title is supposed to read "Are misses as 'bad' as blunders?". I apologize for the confusion.

Generally, most of my games end with around half a dozen mistakes and/or blunders counted in the quick analysis, regardless of winning or losing. However, when I enter the in-depth game review, it turns out that most of these "blunders" weren't hung pieces or permitted attacks but instead missed attacks. Some of these are simple one-move takes I easily notice in retrospect, while others are multiple move sequences I never would have expected from low-level play.

My question here is: Should I worry about finding these moves? When I try to find complex tactics, I usually end up failing the attack due to unforeseen circumstances and losing material. I try to follow the advice of eliminating blunders as my first step to improve. But it feels like I'm going nowhere when the engine acts as if I hung a piece when I play it safe rather than following a specific ten move chain to win a single pawn. Your feedback is appreciated.

Blunders are worse than misses.

https://support.chess.com/en/articles/8572705-how-are-moves-classified-what-is-a-blunder-or-brilliant-and-etc

sukunaaa69

"no"

Mickdonedee

A Miss is not as bad as a Blunder. A Blunder will worsen your position. A Miss means there was a quicker way to checkmate your opponent, or capture a hanging piece that would improve your position.

tygxc

@1

"Generally, most of my games end with around half a dozen mistakes and/or blunders counted in the quick analysis, regardless of winning or losing."

'The winner is the one who makes the next-to-last mistake.' - Tartakower

"Should I worry about finding these moves?"
++ Yes. Identify your mistakes. Pay close attention to your decisive mistake.

"I try to follow the advice of eliminating blunders as my first step to improve." ++ Great.
'Sit on your hands' - Tarrasch

ChessMasteryOfficial

It's generally recommended to focus on eliminating blunders first, as these are the most costly mistakes that can quickly turn the tide of a game.

BigChessplayer665

I do recommend finding the misses due to being able to convert properly being the most important skill in chess if you can spot tactics but not convert you are still prob going to lose

The other important skill is avoiding blunders AND mistakes if you think a mistake was important go and analyze it but if it was just a mouse slip or "me miss free piece" just look at it but there's not really any point in going in depth I may opinion it depends on the type of blunders and mistakes

queenravager000
Glad_Hander wrote:

EDIT: Before reading, please know that I mistyped the title of this thread. The title is supposed to read "Are misses as 'bad' as blunders?". I apologize for the confusion.

Generally, most of my games end with around half a dozen mistakes and/or blunders counted in the quick analysis, regardless of winning or losing. However, when I enter the in-depth game review, it turns out that most of these "blunders" weren't hung pieces or permitted attacks but instead missed attacks. Some of these are simple one-move takes I easily notice in retrospect, while others are multiple move sequences I never would have expected from low-level play.

My question here is: Should I worry about finding these moves? When I try to find complex tactics, I usually end up failing the attack due to unforeseen circumstances and losing material. I try to follow the advice of eliminating blunders as my first step to improve. But it feels like I'm going nowhere when the engine acts as if I hung a piece when I play it safe rather than following a specific ten move chain to win a single pawn. Your feedback is appreciated.

whats the account number

V_Awful_Chess

Wouldn't it depend on why you lost (assuming you did lose).

I would think if you lost due to time, a miss might be worse than a blunder because it delayed your win long enough for you to time out.

Mickdonedee
V_Awful_Chess wrote:

Wouldn't it depend on why you lost (assuming you did lose).

I would think if you lost due to time, a miss might be worse than a blunder because it delayed your win long enough for you to time out.

That scenario could happen but not in general.

V_Awful_Chess

Another thing worth thinking about: missed wins might be easier to "fix" than blunders.

If you hang your rook, the best advice might be to "pay more attention next time". Well, that's easier said than done.

If you miss a royal fork, the best advice might be to do some puzzles/lessons on forks or something. That's much easier to put into action.

Chessesmewhoareu

Blunders r the worst :/

Peterh415
a miss is just you had an opportunity to play a brilliant move or something
SacrifycedStoat
When your opponent makes a mistake/miss/blunder, punishing them is a great move, but otherwise it’s a miss.