Chess Openings for beginner?

Sort:
Avatar of SamuelAjedrez95
magipi wrote:

This is ridiculous. The opening is over when you developed all 4 minor pieces and castled to safety. That requires 7 moves minimum.

Learning 4 moves and learning that it is called "Open Sicilian" does exactly nothing.

On the other hand, finding the list of "opening principles" and learning them does quite a lot.

Generally speaking.

Some openings, you can leave the king in the centre of the board for a while though, like in the Sicilian or Sämisch King's Indian.

Also yes learning opening principles instead of just openings is important. This way you learn to play good chess, regardless of what your opponent plays, instead of just an opening.

Learning openings is also still important though as they can demonstrate those principles. They introduce ideas to you which can be relevant in many scenarios. As long as we understand the openings instead of just memorising.

Avatar of Moonflux
magipi wrote:
AsmodeusTheThird wrote:
DelphiPax wrote:

Hello. I’m a beginner. When you say “opening,” how many moves do you mean?

A 2-4 move sequence.

This is ridiculous. The opening is over when you developed all 4 minor pieces and castled to safety. That requires 7 moves minimum.

Learning 4 moves and learning that it is called "Open Sicilian" does exactly nothing.

On the other hand, finding the list of "opening principles" and learning them does quite a lot.

A beginner at chess should not have to memorize tons of move-heavy variations to enjoy the game. When I say 2-4 move sequence, I mean that that is all a beginner needs to know. From there the opening is simple development. At lower levels, general opening principles are much more important then memorizing openings. Additionally, beginners should focus on middlegame, tactics, and seeing several moves ahead, as those are more important than specific openings.

Avatar of aindust123

Italian

Avatar of Idylla0

For black French Defence, in my opinion

Avatar of magipi
AsmodeusTheThird wrote:
magipi wrote:
AsmodeusTheThird wrote:
DelphiPax wrote:

Hello. I’m a beginner. When you say “opening,” how many moves do you mean?

A 2-4 move sequence.

This is ridiculous. The opening is over when you developed all 4 minor pieces and castled to safety. That requires 7 moves minimum.

Learning 4 moves and learning that it is called "Open Sicilian" does exactly nothing.

On the other hand, finding the list of "opening principles" and learning them does quite a lot.

A beginner at chess should not have to memorize tons of move-heavy variations to enjoy the game. When I say 2-4 move sequence, I mean that that is all a beginner needs to know. From there the opening is simple development. At lower levels, general opening principles are much more important then memorizing openings. Additionally, beginners should focus on middlegame, tactics, and seeing several moves ahead, as those are more important than specific openings.

Do you just pretend that I said the opposite of what I said? This is bizarre.

Avatar of FlamingBishops

The London System is decent. There are lots of videos about it.

Avatar of badger_song

I back playing 1.e4 openings...starting w/the oldest/most solid and working foreward,but sticking w/1. e4 . Play 30-40 blitz games at 10/0 ( or even 5/0) with each opening you try and see what you like....then stick with that opening going foreward .Couple that w/ using the QGA or QGD for 1.d4 and learn,as suggested opening principles, and you are set for a few years.

Avatar of Ilampozhil25
magipi wrote:
AsmodeusTheThird wrote:
magipi wrote:
AsmodeusTheThird wrote:
DelphiPax wrote:

Hello. I’m a beginner. When you say “opening,” how many moves do you mean?

A 2-4 move sequence.

This is ridiculous. The opening is over when you developed all 4 minor pieces and castled to safety. That requires 7 moves minimum.

Learning 4 moves and learning that it is called "Open Sicilian" does exactly nothing.

On the other hand, finding the list of "opening principles" and learning them does quite a lot.

A beginner at chess should not have to memorize tons of move-heavy variations to enjoy the game. When I say 2-4 move sequence, I mean that that is all a beginner needs to know. From there the opening is simple development. At lower levels, general opening principles are much more important then memorizing openings. Additionally, beginners should focus on middlegame, tactics, and seeing several moves ahead, as those are more important than specific openings.

Do you just pretend that I said the opposite of what I said? This is bizarre.

okok

what they mean is that after e4 c5 nf3 d6 d4 cxd4 nxd4, most beginners will play something ridiculous (like, idk, b3 or something) and then they just play chess

ie the full 7 move (or more) mainline will rarely be reached

they are just agreeing with you (and clarifying their statement), and then you twist it into thinking that they disagree

this is bizarre