help me im sucking

Play some puzzles, they help you see how to win.

Restart pounding those energy drinks. Check YouTube after every second move.

"... for those that want to be as good as they can be, they'll have to work hard.

Play opponents who are better than you … . Learn basic endgames. Create a simple opening repertoire (understanding the moves are far more important than memorizing them). Study tactics. And pick up tons of patterns. That’s the drumbeat of success. ..." - IM Jeremy Silman (December 27, 2018)

https://www.chess.com/article/view/little-things-that-help-your-game

https://www.chess.com/article/view/how-to-start-out-in-chess

https://www.chess.com/news/view/a-new-years-resolution-improve-your-chess-with-new-lessons
"... In order to maximize the benefits of [theory and practice], these two should be approached in a balanced manner. ... Play as many slow games (60 5 or preferably slower) as possible, ... The other side of improvement is theory. ... This can be reading books, taking lessons, watching videos, doing problems on software, etc. ..." - NM Dan Heisman (2002)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140627084053/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/heisman19.pdf
"... If it’s instruction, you look for an author that addresses players at your level (buying something that’s too advanced won’t help you at all). This means that a classic book that is revered by many people might not be useful for you. ..." - IM Jeremy Silman (2015)
https://www.chess.com/article/view/the-best-chess-books-ever
Here are some reading possibilities that I often mention:
Simple Attacking Plans by Fred Wilson (2012)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708090402/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review874.pdf
http://dev.jeremysilman.com/shop/pc/Simple-Attacking-Plans-77p3731.htm
Logical Chess: Move by Move by Irving Chernev (1957)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708104437/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/logichess.pdf
The Most Instructive Games of Chess Ever Played by Irving Chernev (1965)
https://chessbookreviews.wordpress.com/tag/most-instructive-games-of-chess-ever-played/
Winning Chess by Irving Chernev and Fred Reinfeld (1948)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708093415/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review919.pdf
Back to Basics: Tactics by Dan Heisman (2007)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708233537/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review585.pdf
https://www.chess.com/article/view/book-review-back-to-basics-tactics

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5856bd64ff7c50433c3803db/t/5895fc0ca5790af7895297e4/1486224396755/btbtactics2excerpt.pdf
Discovering Chess Openings by GM John Emms (2006)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140627114655/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen91.pdf
Openings for Amateurs by Pete Tamburro (2014)
http://kenilworthian.blogspot.com/2014/05/review-of-pete-tamburros-openings-for.html
https://chessbookreviews.wordpress.com/tag/openings-for-amateurs/
https://www.mongoosepress.com/catalog/excerpts/openings_amateurs.pdf
Chess Endgames for Kids by Karsten Müller (2015)
https://chessbookreviews.wordpress.com/tag/chess-endgames-for-kids/
http://www.gambitbooks.com/pdfs/Chess_Endgames_for_Kids.pdf
A Guide to Chess Improvement by Dan Heisman (2010)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708105628/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review781.pdf
Studying Chess Made Easy by Andrew Soltis (2009)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708090448/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review750.pdf
Seirawan stuff:
http://seagaard.dk/review/eng/bo_beginner/ev_winning_chess.asp?KATID=BO&ID=BO-Beginner
http://www.nystar.com/tamarkin/review1.htm
https://web.archive.org/web/20140627132508/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen173.pdf
https://www.chess.com/article/view/book-review-winning-chess-endings
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708092617/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review560.pdf

Lol found you

lol

Energy drink wont be sufficient,try taking a whiff of elephant poop after each move instead of watching youtube. Inhale deeply and let the smell awaken your instincts

Hu?

Or this

Instead of energy drinks, take chicken essence.

That makes tonnEs sence.

that explained the used for orange cones.

Read Silman instead of sillman 

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/jeremy-sillman-makes-no-sense

Well, while concentration may be the issue, it usually goes to understanding what you should be doing, and the habit to do it properly and fast.

See, the proper evaluation of a position (equal, slightly better, better, and so on) is probably the most important skill for a chess player. And is not about "hey, I have the pair of Bishops, or I control the file", but piece activity for both sides. This means that the usual position's qualities considered (time, material, space) are subordinated to how effectively they allow to develop threats (piece activity), where these threats are basically capturing material, checkmate, or increasing the conditions (time, material, space) to develop and execute such threats.

Say White plays into a position where he threatens mate in 2... but Black is threatening mate in 1. Then it's clear that White isn't really threatening a thing. And it goes to see if he has the moves, pieces, and squares to deal with Black's threat without unbalancing concessions (by the way, such concessions are usually of the time, material and space natures).

Now, blundering material is typical when not checking the opponent's activity. While for elite players this happens rarely, it still does. Why is that? Because competitive players are usually restricted by the clocks, so they don't check it all, assuming his rival doesn't have activity in a given sector. Such educated guessing is based on practice and erudition, and is usually correct.

Is it the same "process of thinking" for casual and beginner players? Yes indeed, but then their's is (usually) a not so much educated guessing. Then for someone who's blundering often, it's recommended to go to basics and train his eye. This is done by checking individually if any of his pieces can be captured advantageously in one move, then (considering he can't reply to the rival's moves) in two moves, three, four and five.

First and foremost, this is about precision, and with practice, speed comes along. This also develops the habit of not leaving undefended material for no good reason (as it raises the opponent's chances to develop threats). And such exercise isn't meant to be done during a live game, but when analyzing positions (usually from a praised game between GMs).

Incidentally, how to develop the conditions for generating piece activity (while leaving the opponent's behind) is what distinguishes chess from the past from today's, as well as the differences between casual and elite players. Then, if you want to play real chess you should start by detecting all the activity in a position, and only then to filter the noise (as it may take too many moves before the rival carries out his own threats, not enough pieces to develop any real threats, or they just lack the necessary squares).

thank you all

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSA9se6t82I&list=PLQsLDm9Rq9bHKEBnElquF8GuWkI1EJ8Zp