How does it help to learn from good players games?

Sort:
zarian1

Recently I have been studying good players games, but i do not see how it helps you improve.

Is their anyone that can tell me how it is supposed to help?

daxypoo
masters games show how the application of principles result in superior positions

paying attention to moves and decisions made in the first moves and the payoff later in the game

examining positions in masters games at the “critical point” and how coordinated and syncd up the pieces are and whatnot
Bgabor91

Dear Chessfriend,

My name is Gabor Balazs. I am a Hungarian FM, fighting for the IM title. My top ELO is 2435. I have been playing chess for 21 years. I won the Hungarian Rapid Championship twice (U16 and U18).

I love teaching chess and it is very important for me that both of us enjoy the lessons beside the hard work. I have pupils almost all the levels from beginners to advanced players (1100-2200 ELO).

Why should you choose me?

- I have a widespread opening repertoire (a lot of openings are analysed by strong Grand Masters).

- I have a lot of chess books in PDF and Chessbase format, so I can teach you the main middlegame plans, the art of calculations, famous chess games and the endgame theory.

- I have elaborated, personalized training plans, which help you to improve your skills effectively.

- I help you analyse your games deeply, so you can realise your mistakes and learn from them.

- I am really flexible and hard-working person, the quality of my work is really important for me.

Please, contact me (balazsgabor1991@gmail.com), if you are interested in working with me, I am looking forward to your message. happy.png

kindaspongey

https://web.archive.org/web/20140627023809/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/heisman50.pdf

Kevin11111111111111
Ok,please
MorphysMayhem
zarian1 wrote:

Recently I have been studying good players games, but i do not see how it helps you improve.

Is their anyone that can tell me how it is supposed to help?

Well, first of all - Don't try to play over modern grandmaster games and try to understand anything. You most likely won't. 

 

Pick a game collection of older masters (such as Tarrasch, Capablanca, Lasker, Nimzo, etc.) such as Masters of the Chessboard by Reti, or The most instructive games of chess ever played by Chernev.

 

Another book that comes to mind is Chess Master versus Chess Amateur by Euwe. That one is particularly good as it demonstrates the typical amateur mistakes and how a master would capilize on it. 

 

The reason for picking older master games is that the main idea of the game (i.e. outpost, color weaknesses, double pawns, etc.) tends to run for many more moves and be the central focus of the game so you can see the idea play itself out. 

 

Modern Grandmaster games can be very dynamic, constantly evolving, and the "main idea" keeps changing every few moves. 

 

Those comments are certainly high-level generalizations for sure, and there are exceptions. 

 

By playing over the older master games and reading the notes, you will start to absorb ideas, and maybe even more importantly start recognizing more patterns. Pattern recognition takes a lot of time, and is what truly separates strong players from much weaker ones. 

 

And by pattern, I don't mean a very specific position, but rather a pattern idea. Such as being in an endgame, and having a 3 to 2 pawn majority on one side of the board, or having a knight outpost on d5, rooks doubled on the 7th rank eating everything in sight, etc. 

 

Good Luck!