Yes, I think the same
How to triple check
Sort:
Dec 15, 2024
0
#63
Chessflyfisher wrote:
OK., guys, let's move on and get serious about "real Chess". Good. Now was that hard? I mean, really? In my Chess club, anybody talking about "triple check" would be fined. End of story-mic drop.
I agree that we need to stay on real chess, but I disagree on "fining" anyone. There's nothing wrong about taking some hindsight to just consider whether some very particular case might make it possible. - - Although we now have figured out there is no such case.
Also see this thread.
Triple check hmm
1cbb wrote:
In xiangqi, the knight's movement is restricted by a piece placed in front of it in the direction that it wants to move to. If that was the case in chess, a triple check would be possible if e8=N+++ was played in the following position.
How is the knight even placed there
You can triple check by not following the rules of chess 🤯 lol
example in my profile
Dec 25, 2024
0
#68
But in actual chess, double check is the closest to triple check
One of the problems I have been working on in my free time is trying to solve the fact that any k-uple checkbelow the nth-uple check in an n dimensional board is feasable! For example, if we extend the 2D board we have to a 3D one, a triple check is possible, just like a double check and a normal check. This might apply for 4D chess and nD chess in general!! It's a pretty exiting idea. You just have to know how to formulate the rules of chess in a n-dimensional board higher than the second order. I won't go into further detail here 😉
A quadruple check is possible in shangxi