AunTheKnight wrote:
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
Are you sure? How old are you?
Judging from the creation of this thread, 8-10.
That sounds like a prison sentence.
I am a noob and I don't know how to play chess:)
Sort:
vineet199 escreveu:
DCthedestroyer wrote:
Guys my rating is 1400 and I don't know how to play chess
This problem is in many indians and it's called hypocrisy and show off.
There are thousands of people who are in 300-400 rating after years of chess playing. So your rating is very high.so u know how to play chess ,you are a attention seeker guy.
I think even 2200s in chess.com are not necessarily good at chess so I don't know about that
And if they are around 300-400 after years they are just simply not taking the game seriously I guess
Either that or they really lack some of the intellectual virtues needed to play chess, but that's a deeper problem
AunTheKnight escreveu:
DCthedestroyer wrote:
Guys my rating is 1400 and I don't know how to play chess
Indeed. Anyone below 2000 doesn’t know how to play chess. Properly, at least.
Uhhh no that's completely wrong there are 1800s online who are masters but ok
Nov 8, 2021
0
#29
DCthedestroyer wrote:
What is the difference btween thread and forum
All of the threads people create, reside within the forum. Forum, threads, posts.
Nov 8, 2021
0
#30
DCthedestroyer wrote:
Actually this was a forum for seeing how people react . I know how to play chess.
I apologise
This would be admitting to trolling. The apology will suffice.
Nov 8, 2021
0
#31
Immaculate_Slayer wrote:
AunTheKnight escreveu:
DCthedestroyer wrote:
Guys my rating is 1400 and I don't know how to play chess
Indeed. Anyone below 2000 doesn’t know how to play chess. Properly, at least.
Uhhh no that's completely wrong there are 1800s online who are masters but ok
Those masters either don’t try or got an exception title.
Nov 8, 2021
0
#32
DCthedestroyer wrote:
Actually this was a forum for seeing how people react . I know how to play chess.
I apologise
*sigh*
AunTheKnight escreveu:
Immaculate_Slayer wrote:
AunTheKnight escreveu:
DCthedestroyer wrote:
Guys my rating is 1400 and I don't know how to play chess
Indeed. Anyone below 2000 doesn’t know how to play chess. Properly, at least.
Uhhh no that's completely wrong there are 1800s online who are masters but ok
Those masters either don’t try or got an exception title.
It's not smart to expect people to take online chess seriously
It's worth nothing in general
Also I know a lot of good players who earn prizes with chess who have a rating below 2000, and that statement that people below that specific level all don't know how to play proper chess is honestly just completely based on your own personal opinion
Which is not enough to say that so many people out there just don't know how to play proper chess and sincerely it doesn't seem to have any basement
And with "trying" I mean they wouldn't actually lose their time going for certain rating ranges in chess.com (which basically has not much to do with real life chess) when they are already good
Nov 8, 2021
0
#34
Immaculate_Slayer wrote:
AunTheKnight escreveu:
Immaculate_Slayer wrote:
AunTheKnight escreveu:
DCthedestroyer wrote:
Guys my rating is 1400 and I don't know how to play chess
Indeed. Anyone below 2000 doesn’t know how to play chess. Properly, at least.
Uhhh no that's completely wrong there are 1800s online who are masters but ok
Those masters either don’t try or got an exception title.
It's not smart to expect people to take online chess seriously
It's worth nothing in general
Also I know a lot of good players who earn prizes with chess who have a rating below 2000, and that statement that people below that specific level all don't know how to play proper chess is honestly just completely based on your own personal opinion
Which is not enough to say that so many people out there just don't know how to play proper chess and sincerely it doesn't seem to have any basement
And with "trying" I mean they wouldn't actually lose their time going for certain rating ranges in chess.com (which basically has not much to do with real life chess) when they are already good
Ratings are a measure of skill.
New to the game and looking for any kind of help so I can beat a real person instead of computer
AunTheKnight escreveu:
Immaculate_Slayer wrote:
AunTheKnight escreveu:
Immaculate_Slayer wrote:
AunTheKnight escreveu:
DCthedestroyer wrote:
Guys my rating is 1400 and I don't know how to play chess
Indeed. Anyone below 2000 doesn’t know how to play chess. Properly, at least.
Uhhh no that's completely wrong there are 1800s online who are masters but ok
Those masters either don’t try or got an exception title.
It's not smart to expect people to take online chess seriously
It's worth nothing in general
Also I know a lot of good players who earn prizes with chess who have a rating below 2000, and that statement that people below that specific level all don't know how to play proper chess is honestly just completely based on your own personal opinion
Which is not enough to say that so many people out there just don't know how to play proper chess and sincerely it doesn't seem to have any basement
And with "trying" I mean they wouldn't actually lose their time going for certain rating ranges in chess.com (which basically has not much to do with real life chess) when they are already good
Ratings are a measure of skill.
FIDE ratings are precise which makes a random online chess site's measure of your casual speed chess skill completely innacurate and useless
Nov 9, 2021
0
#38
Immaculate_Slayer wrote:
AunTheKnight escreveu:
Immaculate_Slayer wrote:
AunTheKnight escreveu:
Immaculate_Slayer wrote:
AunTheKnight escreveu:
DCthedestroyer wrote:
Guys my rating is 1400 and I don't know how to play chess
Indeed. Anyone below 2000 doesn’t know how to play chess. Properly, at least.
Uhhh no that's completely wrong there are 1800s online who are masters but ok
Those masters either don’t try or got an exception title.
It's not smart to expect people to take online chess seriously
It's worth nothing in general
Also I know a lot of good players who earn prizes with chess who have a rating below 2000, and that statement that people below that specific level all don't know how to play proper chess is honestly just completely based on your own personal opinion
Which is not enough to say that so many people out there just don't know how to play proper chess and sincerely it doesn't seem to have any basement
And with "trying" I mean they wouldn't actually lose their time going for certain rating ranges in chess.com (which basically has not much to do with real life chess) when they are already good
Ratings are a measure of skill.
FIDE ratings are precise which makes a random online chess site's measure of your casual speed chess skill completely innacurate and useless
Yes, but assuming most people don’t try to think through their moves isn’t fair to them. Lots of people try their best even in online games.
this is literally a weird flex but ok moment
Are you sure? How old are you?
Judging from the creation of this thread, 8-10.