To do that is called trolling, friend.
I am a noob and I don't know how to play chess:)
Sort:
ChesswithNickolay escreveu:
Immaculate_Slayer wrote:
AunTheKnight escreveu:
Immaculate_Slayer wrote:
AunTheKnight escreveu:
Immaculate_Slayer wrote:
AunTheKnight escreveu:
DCthedestroyer wrote:
Guys my rating is 1400 and I don't know how to play chess
Indeed. Anyone below 2000 doesn’t know how to play chess. Properly, at least.
Uhhh no that's completely wrong there are 1800s online who are masters but ok
Those masters either don’t try or got an exception title.
It's not smart to expect people to take online chess seriously
It's worth nothing in general
Also I know a lot of good players who earn prizes with chess who have a rating below 2000, and that statement that people below that specific level all don't know how to play proper chess is honestly just completely based on your own personal opinion
Which is not enough to say that so many people out there just don't know how to play proper chess and sincerely it doesn't seem to have any basement
And with "trying" I mean they wouldn't actually lose their time going for certain rating ranges in chess.com (which basically has not much to do with real life chess) when they are already good
Ratings are a measure of skill.
FIDE ratings are precise which makes a random online chess site's measure of your casual speed chess skill completely innacurate and useless
No, a chess site has its own ratings. You can still measure the skill level of a particular player no matter the type of rating system.
Yeah you can measure it wrong tho
Nov 10, 2021
0
#45
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
FIDE and National ratings though are the only true precisely accurate rating, unless you haven't played enough games OTB.
That’s not how accuracy works. Sure, they’re the “official” ratings, but you can’t compare rating accuracies from different pools. If everyone’s rating on a chess site is inflated by 200 points, then their rating will be accurate on the chess site.
AunTheKnight escreveu:
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
FIDE and National ratings though are the only true precisely accurate rating, unless you haven't played enough games OTB.
That’s not how accuracy works. Sure, they’re the “official” ratings, but you can’t compare rating accuracies from different pools. If everyone’s rating on a chess site is inflated by 200 points, then their rating will be accurate on the chess site.
yeah but that's not how it works
Cutie-April wrote:
この会話がまだどのように進んでいるのか、私にはおかしいです
同意した
studying openings and games of world champions helped in my case
Nov 11, 2021
0
#49
Immaculate_Slayer wrote:
AunTheKnight escreveu:
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
FIDE and National ratings though are the only true precisely accurate rating, unless you haven't played enough games OTB.
That’s not how accuracy works. Sure, they’re the “official” ratings, but you can’t compare rating accuracies from different pools. If everyone’s rating on a chess site is inflated by 200 points, then their rating will be accurate on the chess site.
yeah but that's not how it works
That is how rating pools work.
AunTheKnight escreveu:
Immaculate_Slayer wrote:
AunTheKnight escreveu:
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
FIDE and National ratings though are the only true precisely accurate rating, unless you haven't played enough games OTB.
That’s not how accuracy works. Sure, they’re the “official” ratings, but you can’t compare rating accuracies from different pools. If everyone’s rating on a chess site is inflated by 200 points, then their rating will be accurate on the chess site.
yeah but that's not how it works
That is how rating pools work.
You are basically saying all rating pools measure the skill of the players correctly
Nov 11, 2021
0
#51
Immaculate_Slayer wrote:
AunTheKnight escreveu:
Immaculate_Slayer wrote:
AunTheKnight escreveu:
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
FIDE and National ratings though are the only true precisely accurate rating, unless you haven't played enough games OTB.
That’s not how accuracy works. Sure, they’re the “official” ratings, but you can’t compare rating accuracies from different pools. If everyone’s rating on a chess site is inflated by 200 points, then their rating will be accurate on the chess site.
yeah but that's not how it works
That is how rating pools work.
You are basically saying all rating pools measure the skill of the players correctly
Yeah, that’s the point of ratings.
Remember, ratings are relative, not absolute.
AunTheKnight escreveu:
Immaculate_Slayer wrote:
AunTheKnight escreveu:
Immaculate_Slayer wrote:
AunTheKnight escreveu:
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
FIDE and National ratings though are the only true precisely accurate rating, unless you haven't played enough games OTB.
That’s not how accuracy works. Sure, they’re the “official” ratings, but you can’t compare rating accuracies from different pools. If everyone’s rating on a chess site is inflated by 200 points, then their rating will be accurate on the chess site.
yeah but that's not how it works
That is how rating pools work.
You are basically saying all rating pools measure the skill of the players correctly
Yeah, that’s the point of ratings.
Remember, ratings are relative, not absolute.
Just because that's their point doesn't mean they succeed in it
But I alr this discussion isn't even worth it since FIDE rating is what actually matters
DCthedestroyer wrote:
Guys my rating is 1400 and I don't know how to play chess
The only thing I know about chess is a tower moves diagonally
but doesn't everyone feel like that whenever they lose a game
Nov 11, 2021
0
#55
AunTheKnight wrote:
DCthedestroyer wrote:
Guys my rating is 1400 and I don't know how to play chess
Indeed. Anyone below 2000 doesn’t know how to play chess. Properly, at least.
That's why I play on Lichess. My ratings are often over 2000 there.
Nov 11, 2021
0
#56
Ziryab wrote:
AunTheKnight wrote:
DCthedestroyer wrote:
Guys my rating is 1400 and I don't know how to play chess
Indeed. Anyone below 2000 doesn’t know how to play chess. Properly, at least.
That's why I play on Lichess. My ratings are often over 2000 there.
Lol
when you aren't even 2000 on lichess...
Nov 11, 2021
0
#58
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
Ziryab wrote:
AunTheKnight wrote:
DCthedestroyer wrote:
Guys my rating is 1400 and I don't know how to play chess
Indeed. Anyone below 2000 doesn’t know how to play chess. Properly, at least.
That's why I play on Lichess. My ratings are often over 2000 there.
On lichess, it is anyone over 2200 at the very least.
Thanks man. Way to crush my ego. 
chess.com ratings are more inflated than lichess can't even break 2000 after like 500 blitz games on lichess.
Guys my rating is 1400 and I don't know how to play chess
that's way better than mine ;-;
this might help a bit