I am not a good player but my rating is 1600+
Sort:
I don't understand how I am able to achieve this rating when I know I am not a good player in chess. Is it due to chess.com giving me really bad players to play with?
Really dude, I ain't trying to demonstrate anything. I literally don't have confidence on my game but when I still win, I think I better you guys. Does this rating really matter?
It's your rating, man, you earned it. Maybe you're just playing more disciplined than you normally do, which is so subtle you may not realize it, but keeps the pressure on your opponents.
darwinwasright wrote:
absk-kr-singh wrote:
I don't understand how I am able to achieve this rating when I know I am not a good player in chess. Is it due to chess.com giving me really bad players to play with?
another look at me post, aren't there enough of them?
I'm sorry if you found anything fishy in my doing so. I was just asking and seeking an opinion from advanced players about my gameplay.
BlindThief wrote:
It's your rating, man, you earned it. Maybe you're just playing more disciplined than you normally do, which is so subtle you may not realize it, but keeps the pressure on your opponents.
Well if that's so then I am happy. 
I will continue playing more games here. Let's see how much ratings I can get in the long run.
I’ve played you. I don’t think you’re that good.
Hey Jerkysweetcorn, we have never played any match together! I just checked my game archive. Anyways, I wish to play with you now. Lets play? :cool
darwinwasright wrote:
absk-kr-singh wrote:
darwinwasright wrote:
absk-kr-singh wrote:
I don't understand how I am able to achieve this rating when I know I am not a good player in chess. Is it due to chess.com giving me really bad players to play with?
another look at me post, aren't there enough of them?
I'm sorry if you found anything fishy in my doing so. I was just asking and seeking an opinion from advanced players about my gameplay.
you have played less than a 100 games and you come on the forum and say I suck at chess but I have got a pretty good rating what B S attention seeking drivel
He's just asking a question about his game. He is allowed to do that.
Saddened to see how my post has invited some demoralizing and rude comments. 
I am sorry that I posted this question in the first place. I should have never come to forum and ask about my progress. It might have made you all feel that I was being boastful about my games (that I don't lose much, which is not true). It is just that I am not confident on my games that's why I came here. Every player is here to improve, and ask experienced players' opinion about his own gameplay. And so was I. There is no way I was trying to seek anybody's attention. If that is the case, I am not going to ask anything from now onwards. Sorry guys!
Jun 3, 2020
0
#13
Your rapid rating is 1600+, rapid 1600 is not a good rating. I earned 1500 rapid when i was a 1100 blitz player and never played rapid after that.
OP is a Troll
Jun 3, 2020
0
#15
absk-kr-singh wrote:
I don't understand how I am able to achieve this rating when I know I am not a good player in chess. Is it due to chess.com giving me really bad players to play with?
1600's hot garbage. So you are 1600 and not good. Case closed
Jun 3, 2020
0
#16
AyushMChessMator wrote:
absk-kr-singh wrote:
I don't understand how I am able to achieve this rating when I know I am not a good player in chess. Is it due to chess.com giving me really bad players to play with?
1600's hot garbage. So you are 1600 and not good. Case closed
I would have to agree, if i werent 1600 when i beat you ayush
Jun 3, 2020
0
#17
AyushMChessMator wrote:
absk-kr-singh wrote:
I don't understand how I am able to achieve this rating when I know I am not a good player in chess. Is it due to chess.com giving me really bad players to play with?
1600's hot garbage. So you are 1600 and not good. Case closed
A harsh way of saying that 1600 is the intermediate level. In my opinion, the "good"/advanced level is 1800+.
Jun 3, 2020
0
#18
1_a31-0 wrote:
AyushMChessMator wrote:
absk-kr-singh wrote:
I don't understand how I am able to achieve this rating when I know I am not a good player in chess. Is it due to chess.com giving me really bad players to play with?
1600's hot garbage. So you are 1600 and not good. Case closed
I would have to agree, if i werent 1600 when i beat you ayush
*In a Blitz game with a back rank checkmate blunder*
Jun 3, 2020
0
#19
Chess4PK wrote:
AyushMChessMator wrote:
absk-kr-singh wrote:
I don't understand how I am able to achieve this rating when I know I am not a good player in chess. Is it due to chess.com giving me really bad players to play with?
1600's hot garbage. So you are 1600 and not good. Case closed
A harsh way of saying that 1600 is the intermediate level. In my opinion, the "good"/advanced level is 1800+.
in my opinion, everything is trash, unless your the talented junior, CM Karry Gasparov.
Jun 3, 2020
0
#20
AyushMChessMator wrote:
1_a31-0 wrote:
AyushMChessMator wrote:
absk-kr-singh wrote:
I don't understand how I am able to achieve this rating when I know I am not a good player in chess. Is it due to chess.com giving me really bad players to play with?
1600's hot garbage. So you are 1600 and not good. Case closed
I would have to agree, if i werent 1600 when i beat you ayush
*In a Blitz game with a back rank checkmate blunder*
*in a game where you got completely outplayed and then blundered*