I'm at 550. I want to improve my game. Why should I do ??
But your bullet rating is 942
Though you played only TWO games ![]()
Bottom lines of the thread
DO NOT BE AFRAID OF PLAYING BULLET. JUST PLAY AND PLAY. YOU WILL BE WINNING FINALLY.
I'm at 550. I want to improve my game. Why should I do ??
But your bullet rating is 942
Though you played only TWO games ![]()
Bottom lines of the thread
DO NOT BE AFRAID OF PLAYING BULLET. JUST PLAY AND PLAY. YOU WILL BE WINNING FINALLY.
Given this is posted in the beginners section I'm going to offer advice ...
Don't play bullet.
Bullet is fun and gives you lots of chances to play openings, but little chance to consider the midgame and almost no endgame experience at all.
Jose Raul Capablanca once said, 'If you want to improve in chess, study the endgame'.
Come back to bullet when your rapid rating is more than 1200
Or ignore my advice completely
90% of billion members do not know about chess graph, notation etc. Why do they study leaving their important works of their life ?
THIS IS FUN TO US. WE CAN'T BE A GM/NM/IM.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
BTW
Are you a GM?
I have absolutely no idea what your post was supposed to mean. It would appear that maybe you thought you were angry with me for saying things I didn't say about chess notation for example???
Hell. No. I am not angry. We are cool. Shakes hands
Actually being a beginner premove is not that easy. It is easy to say for you. So you are not a good teacher
2|1 is okay yet bullet is hard, different & fine if you like chess & can really play that fast. I think 5|5 blitz is better. 🙂
If you enjoy reinforcing bad habits, making lightning-speed blunders, and pretending speed equals skill, then sure, bullet chess is just the thing for serious improvement. Why bother with thoughtful analysis and deep strategy when you can play bullet chess and rely on pure luck instead?
If you enjoy reinforcing bad habits, making lightning-speed blunders, and pretending speed equals skill, then sure, bullet chess is just the thing for serious improvement. Why bother with thoughtful analysis and deep strategy when you can play bullet chess and rely on pure luck instead?
bullet chess is not luck its a highest form of chess in pattern recognition so dont even judge any mode
tho begginer really should play rapid more
Given this is posted in the beginners section I'm going to offer advice ...
Don't play bullet.
Bullet is fun and gives you lots of chances to play openings, but little chance to consider the midgame and almost no endgame experience at all.
Jose Raul Capablanca once said, 'If you want to improve in chess, study the endgame'.
Come back to bullet when your rapid rating is more than 1200
Or ignore my advice completely
90% of billion members do not know about chess graph, notation etc. Why do they study leaving their important works of their life
?
THIS IS FUN TO US. WE CAN'T BE A GM/NM/IM.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
BTW
Are you a GM?