Need help choosing some openings to start studying

Sort:
Solipsicon

Hello, and thank you for taking the time to help me out.

First and foremost, let me address the raised hairs I may have caused in the back of your neck by mentioning openings as a beginner chess player.

I understand that one should start with the basic principles of chess. I did. I understand the importance of the center, of developing my pieces, castling, etc. I'm at the stage where I want to start playing a bit more competitively, instead of just occasionally a friend, or the old man, and to learn alongside my partner, who is also curious about the game.

In order to achieve this, I have been learning about the general principles of the game, but stumbled upon a series of videos that goes through the openings exploring why they are this way or that, and not such and such, addressing matters like principles, strategy, traps, and tactics.

What I would like to do is to use these videos to start learning some starting moves and discussing them with my partner. My vision is that we'd agree to play games where we try to execute an opening to the best of our abilities, and when we get to the point when we forget the moves, we fall back on tactics and general principles. This would, as I see it, give us the best of both worlds: interesting starting games and still plenty of space to learn with our mistakes.

To achieve this, I would like to have a roadmap. Two openings and two defenses to aim towards. This way, we could eventually get to the point where we could expect to have a half decent response to the most common openings from white, queen and king's pawns. I'm envisioning something like starting out with, say, the queen's gambit and the slav defense (just as an example). Play enough games with my partner where we can both execute the moves to a half decent extent. Then some other queen's pawn opening. Then a king's pawn one. And so on.

As you can see, this is a long-term project to get chess into our lives. But I don't presume to be able to memorize every line of every opening ever. So, if you could suggest something for our early stages, it would be very helpful. For example, maybe there's a black defense that works well both against the queen's gambit and some other queen's pawn opening. Then we'd only need one more to deal with king's pawn. As we feel more comfortable with one opening, we could shake things up by playing a game with a different one, so we don't get bored or frustrated, but ideally we'd stick with two, and try to memorize and understand its most common lines. Of course, if we play someone who opens with something else, fall back on general principles.

So, if you think you can help me out, I'd very much appreciate it. Again, thanks for taking the time to read all this.

Toldsted

Great project! I would recommend you to study the open games: begin with 1.e4 and answer with 1..e5. Thus concentrate your project on 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 or 3.Bc4 (throw a dice if you does not have a preference). Ignore (in the beginning) that your opponents can play a lot of other stuff like 1..c5 Sicilian or 2..Nf6 Petrof or 1.d4, because your are not making a superluss repertoire but trying to learn chess by learning an opening more deeply.

Remember to make notes of your conclusions, so you can use them (and probably revice them) later on!

RussBell

Chess Openings Resources for Beginners and Beyond...

https://www.chess.com/blog/RussBell/openings-resources-for-beginners-and-beyond

harriw

Sounds like a nice project. For 1. e4 I would recommend the Ruy Lopez, it has theory as much as you want to go through, but also very solid (and interesting) sidelines starting right on move 3. You can choose between a quiet approach and more attacking lines, I've had many interesting games with it. It is also a very common opening at the grandmaster level. For 1. d4 the Queen's gambit declined is probably the most natural point of starting. It offers a positional struggle at the center. Accepting the gambit will lead to a more open play and you may want to try that, too.

Paleobotanical

I'm currently working through the "Discovering Chess Openings" book mentioned favorably in RussBell's blog, and can't recommend it strongly enough as a resource for something like that.  It literally starts from first principles to explore why popular opening moves are good and why lesser-seen openings can be problematic.

ShamusMcFlannigan

The chigorin defense is a great starting point against d4.  It's interesting, active, and not overly theoretical.  once you get the spirit of it the moves are very easy to find as well.  Later on it will also give you an appreciation for being able to play a quick c5 in the qgd.

If you are looking for a second defense, the tarrasch qgd is also active and can be played against multiple first moves.

BackplayingChess

Last time I became a chess player I used the Chigorin Defense to the Queen's Gambit but kept being caught off script when we played 1 d4 d5 and he played c4 AFTER move 2.  So I had I learn the Queen's Gambit Accepted and transpose to that.

JackRoach

I used Scotch game with very good results.

Italian game is what I use now. Very useful opening.

ShamusMcFlannigan
JackRoach wrote:

I used Scotch game with very good results.

Italian game is what I use now. Very useful opening.

+1 for scotch

daxypoo
any classical opening will suit you fine and you only need to get a feel for the first few moves anyways

“where are knights being developed?”
“where are bishops going?”
“how is center affected?”

in pretty much every game you play you will most certainly be out of book by 5th move

(unless you are playing daily)

but looking at lines in classical openings can help you get a decent stake in games
jonnin

Two openings: white, e4(Vienna) and d4 (queens gambit)

and two defenses:  c5 Sicilian and QGD marshall variation.  If c5 is too complex (it can get rough for beginners) then try d5 (scandanavian, modern variety -- do NOT fool with the classic queen runs out right away line at this point in your learning).  

 

e4/e5 is a tough sell for black once you get a little deeper.  

atiugev

Depende on your chess style, also if you have good memory or prefer play chess structures as system.

Fahmin-Afandi

SelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSeSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamlamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelamSelam

cerebov

If you want to study openings, sure, why not? Almost certainly it will be worthless and a waste of time, but if that is what you want, go ahead.

I personally think it would be much-much more efficient and much-much more fun to watch some entertaining videos about middle games and chess strategy and famous players and famous games and pick up some opening knowledge from them.

drewmcg

Like yourself, Solipscion, I am a chess beginner and have started looking at openings. One that you may wish to look at (for white), and one that I have enjoyed using, is the Danish gambit. It can seem a bit counter intuitive but it's great for development.

Moonwarrior_1

Vienna system is easy to learn hard to master. But works from beginner to a high level of play

Marie-AnneLiz

This should help you to choose some opening:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bK6rAfukA44&feature=youtu.be

Marie-AnneLiz
atiugev a écrit :

Depende on your chess style, also if you have good memory or prefer play chess structures as system.

thumbup.png

3ioo
Wow this sounds great and I’m looking forward to seeing a lot from your project.
Marie-AnneLiz