Yeah, with the open f file and the a7 bishop, kingside play seems more natural there.
But there's really nothing really wrong with 16...d5 strategically. After 18...Rxd5 your control over d4 means you can keep the d3 pawn weak and you'll also have long lasting pressure on f2. Your e pawn is isolated, but it's firmly defended by the knight (white has no minor pieces).
But 16...d5 is bad for tactical reasons. White can play Qb3 (before or after capturing on d5) which will win some material. Without that black would be winning easily. In the game white played the bad move 19.c4 after which black is winning (and went on to win the game).
Hi everyone,
I just played a really nice game as black where I played pretty accurately even though I was uncomfortable after an early attack on my f-pawn (knight + bishop for a rook). At some point I found my position ready to open up so I wanted to do a pawn break. Afterwards I saw that this move was classified as a blunder. Unfortunately the computer cant really explain how come. Does any of you have an idea why this pawn break on the d-file is a bad move?
Happy to hear also alternative ways I couldve continued besides the pawn break through the center. Maybe via the f-file with a battery?
Btw, first post here!
Kind regards, Willem