People keep falling for the wayward

Sort:
JackRoach
freerobuxman wrote:

Stop being salty that you lost against a low rated player that played the wayward

One game? Maybe when I was 500 rated ig. I wouldn't fall for it anymore at my level.

Infinite_Blitz
JackRoach wrote:

I'm sure the Stafford Gambit is a good gambit or whatever. Maybe it's bad, idc.

We are talking about the Wayward Queen Attack. And it is much more realistic to get to 1000 then to get to 2000 maybe when the Stafford and Danish gambits don't work as well.

 

Point is, getting high rated with the Wayward Queen attack is impossible.

Stafford isn't good if the opponent knows what to do. Just like the Wayward. And like I said earlier, the wayward is a good opening for beginners.  

PunchboxNET

my friend @pondestroyer12309 played the napoleon when he was white and like 300 rated, his rating jacked up a bit. He won a lot.

JackRoach

I think you need to read this one more time, you'll get it this time:

Do you know the definition of, "improve?"

The wayward Queen attack I'm sure will trip up beginners. And if they improve, then they won't be playing beginners anymore.

 

And when they don't play beginners anymore, then the Wayward Queen Attack won't work, and they'll have to COMPLETELY reassess their opening, instead of playing an opening like Italian Game which would have worked perfectly fine at beginner level.

Infinite_Blitz
JackRoach wrote:

I think you need to read this one more time, you'll get it this time:

Do you know the definition of, "improve?"

The wayward Queen attack I'm sure will trip up beginners. And if they improve, then they won't be playing beginners anymore.

 

And when they don't play beginners anymore, then the Wayward Queen Attack won't work, and they'll have to COMPLETELY reassess their opening, instead of playing an opening like Italian Game which would have worked perfectly fine at beginner level.

Yes, that is what I just said

Infinite_Blitz
JackRoach wrote:

I think you need to read this one more time, you'll get it this time:

Do you know the definition of, "improve?"

The wayward Queen attack I'm sure will trip up beginners. And if they improve, then they won't be playing beginners anymore.

 

And when they don't play beginners anymore, then the Wayward Queen Attack won't work, and they'll have to COMPLETELY reassess their opening, instead of playing an opening like Italian Game which would have worked perfectly fine at beginner level.

They don't have to completely reassess their opening I guess it's still playable

 

JackRoach

This is what you said:

Why do you think that'll help them improve more? There is nothing wrong with using an opening that beginners fall for alot. 

JackRoach

This is what I said:

I think you need to read this one more time, you'll get it this time:

Do you know the definition of, "improve?"

The wayward Queen attack I'm sure will trip up beginners. And if they improve, then they won't be playing beginners anymore.

 

And when they don't play beginners anymore, then the Wayward Queen Attack won't work, and they'll have to COMPLETELY reassess their opening, instead of playing an opening like Italian Game which would have worked perfectly fine at beginner level.

Infinite_Blitz
JackRoach wrote:

This is what you said:

Why do you think that'll help them improve more? There is nothing wrong with using an opening that beginners fall for alot. 

And I also said that the wayward is good against beginners, but 800s should know how to punish it

JackRoach
freerobuxman wrote:
JackRoach wrote:

I think you need to read this one more time, you'll get it this time:

Do you know the definition of, "improve?"

The wayward Queen attack I'm sure will trip up beginners. And if they improve, then they won't be playing beginners anymore.

 

And when they don't play beginners anymore, then the Wayward Queen Attack won't work, and they'll have to COMPLETELY reassess their opening, instead of playing an opening like Italian Game which would have worked perfectly fine at beginner level.

They don't have to completely reassess their opening I guess it's still playable

 

Come on man. Yes it's playable but it completely gives away the advantage to black! 

The Grob opening is playable, does that mean they should play that?

JackRoach
freerobuxman wrote:
JackRoach wrote:

This is what you said:

Why do you think that'll help them improve more? There is nothing wrong with using an opening that beginners fall for alot. 

And I also said that the wayward is good against beginners, but 800s should know how to punish it

Yet you are still saying it's not bad to play it.

Infinite_Blitz

The wayward also gives the player an idea of a way to attack. Like this:

 

PunchboxNET
PunchboxNET wrote:

my friend @pondestroyer12309 played the napoleon when he was white and like 300 rated, his rating jacked up a bit. He won a lot.

He didnt feel sorry, he needed to get to his real rating. Then he played actually sound.

Edit: this was bullet

Infinite_Blitz
JackRoach wrote:
freerobuxman wrote:
JackRoach wrote:

This is what you said:

Why do you think that'll help them improve more? There is nothing wrong with using an opening that beginners fall for alot. 

And I also said that the wayward is good against beginners, but 800s should know how to punish it

Yet you are still saying it's not bad to play it.

Bruh I said for beginners. For intermediates or advanced players, the position you can get is still playable

JackRoach
freerobuxman wrote:

The wayward also gives the player an idea of a way to attack. Like this:

 

What.

That's....

not....

the WAYWARD QUEEN ATTACK

Stop going off topic, we're not talking about the Damiano Defense.

JackRoach
freerobuxman wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
freerobuxman wrote:
JackRoach wrote:

This is what you said:

Why do you think that'll help them improve more? There is nothing wrong with using an opening that beginners fall for alot. 

And I also said that the wayward is good against beginners, but 800s should know how to punish it

Yet you are still saying it's not bad to play it.

Bruh I said for beginners. For intermediates or advanced players, the position you can get is still playable

Like I said, the Grob is playable.

Therefore I will reccomend it to everyone I come across and defend everyone who plays it.

Infinite_Blitz
JackRoach wrote:
freerobuxman wrote:

The wayward also gives the player an idea of a way to attack. Like this:

 

What.

That's....

not....

the WAYWARD QUEEN ATTACK

Stop going off topic, we're not talking about the Damiano Defense.

I said it gives an idea of how to attack. 

Infinite_Blitz
JackRoach wrote:
freerobuxman wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
freerobuxman wrote:
JackRoach wrote:

This is what you said:

Why do you think that'll help them improve more? There is nothing wrong with using an opening that beginners fall for alot. 

And I also said that the wayward is good against beginners, but 800s should know how to punish it

Yet you are still saying it's not bad to play it.

Bruh I said for beginners. For intermediates or advanced players, the position you can get is still playable

Like I said, the Grob is playable.

Therefore I will reccomend it to everyone I come across and defend everyone who plays it.

I agree, it's playable

Infinite_Blitz
JackRoach wrote:
freerobuxman wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
freerobuxman wrote:
JackRoach wrote:

This is what you said:

Why do you think that'll help them improve more? There is nothing wrong with using an opening that beginners fall for alot. 

And I also said that the wayward is good against beginners, but 800s should know how to punish it

Yet you are still saying it's not bad to play it.

Bruh I said for beginners. For intermediates or advanced players, the position you can get is still playable

Like I said, the Grob is playable.

Therefore I will reccomend it to everyone I come across and defend everyone who plays it.

Playable does not mean good.

JackRoach
freerobuxman wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
freerobuxman wrote:

The wayward also gives the player an idea of a way to attack. Like this:

 

What.

That's....

not....

the WAYWARD QUEEN ATTACK

Stop going off topic, we're not talking about the Damiano Defense.

I said it gives an idea of how to attack. 

Yes, but it is refuted easily. This means nothing.

And usually good attacking in chess doesn't mean scholar's mate, so I don't understand what you mean.